A comparison of milk yields and methane production from three contrasting high-yield dairy cattle feeding regimes: cut-and-carry, partial grazing and total mixed ration

L Cameron, MGG Chagunda, DJ Roberts, MA Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There have been reductions in grazing cattle and corresponding increases in mixed diets across many regions. Mixed diets consist of silage, grains, legumes and other herbaceous plants (termed total mixed ration, TMR). TMR has been associated with increased milk yields but has also been linked to increased enteric methane production. We measured milk yields and methane production from high-yielding Holstein- Friesian cattle after substituting 29%–36% of a TMR diet with grass. Two feeding treatments were compared with a diet of TMR: grass grazed at pasture and grass cut in the field and delivered to housed cattle (termed cut-and-carry). Each feeding treatment was fed to 15 cattle, and the experiment was conducted in South-west Scotland. Using a laser methane detector, we measured a twofold and fourfold decline in enteric methane production for the cut-and-carry and grazing groups, respectively, when the animals consumed grass. TMR was consumed by both grassfed groups overnight, so daily values were adjusted to include elevated methane production during this period. This revealed that methane production for the cutand- carry and grazing groups was 17% and 39% lower than for the TMR-fed group respectively. Milk yields were maintained for all three groups, and the efficiency of milk production per unit of methane was substantially greater for the two grass-fed groups. A shift away from exclusively feeding TMR by adding fresh grass to the diets of cattle could contribute to meeting emissions targets and could also represent an economically sustainable climate change mitigation strategy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)789 - 797
Number of pages9
JournalGrass and Forage Science
Volume73
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - 2 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

cattle feeding
total mixed rations
methane production
dairy cattle
milk yield
grazing
grasses
cattle
methane
diet
Daily Values
silage
detectors
lasers
Holstein
legumes
pastures
climate change

Bibliographical note

2058779

Keywords

  • Cut-and-carry
  • Enteric methane
  • Forage
  • Greenhouse gases
  • Zero grazing

Cite this

@article{9e55a567dcf241d6aceb8c7cc65af003,
title = "A comparison of milk yields and methane production from three contrasting high-yield dairy cattle feeding regimes: cut-and-carry, partial grazing and total mixed ration",
abstract = "There have been reductions in grazing cattle and corresponding increases in mixed diets across many regions. Mixed diets consist of silage, grains, legumes and other herbaceous plants (termed total mixed ration, TMR). TMR has been associated with increased milk yields but has also been linked to increased enteric methane production. We measured milk yields and methane production from high-yielding Holstein- Friesian cattle after substituting 29{\%}–36{\%} of a TMR diet with grass. Two feeding treatments were compared with a diet of TMR: grass grazed at pasture and grass cut in the field and delivered to housed cattle (termed cut-and-carry). Each feeding treatment was fed to 15 cattle, and the experiment was conducted in South-west Scotland. Using a laser methane detector, we measured a twofold and fourfold decline in enteric methane production for the cut-and-carry and grazing groups, respectively, when the animals consumed grass. TMR was consumed by both grassfed groups overnight, so daily values were adjusted to include elevated methane production during this period. This revealed that methane production for the cutand- carry and grazing groups was 17{\%} and 39{\%} lower than for the TMR-fed group respectively. Milk yields were maintained for all three groups, and the efficiency of milk production per unit of methane was substantially greater for the two grass-fed groups. A shift away from exclusively feeding TMR by adding fresh grass to the diets of cattle could contribute to meeting emissions targets and could also represent an economically sustainable climate change mitigation strategy.",
keywords = "Cut-and-carry, Enteric methane, Forage, Greenhouse gases, Zero grazing",
author = "L Cameron and MGG Chagunda and DJ Roberts and MA Lee",
note = "2058779",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1111/gfs.12353",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "789 -- 797",
journal = "Grass and Forage Science",
issn = "0142-5242",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

A comparison of milk yields and methane production from three contrasting high-yield dairy cattle feeding regimes: cut-and-carry, partial grazing and total mixed ration. / Cameron, L; Chagunda, MGG; Roberts, DJ; Lee, MA.

In: Grass and Forage Science, Vol. 73, No. 3, 02.03.2018, p. 789 - 797.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of milk yields and methane production from three contrasting high-yield dairy cattle feeding regimes: cut-and-carry, partial grazing and total mixed ration

AU - Cameron, L

AU - Chagunda, MGG

AU - Roberts, DJ

AU - Lee, MA

N1 - 2058779

PY - 2018/3/2

Y1 - 2018/3/2

N2 - There have been reductions in grazing cattle and corresponding increases in mixed diets across many regions. Mixed diets consist of silage, grains, legumes and other herbaceous plants (termed total mixed ration, TMR). TMR has been associated with increased milk yields but has also been linked to increased enteric methane production. We measured milk yields and methane production from high-yielding Holstein- Friesian cattle after substituting 29%–36% of a TMR diet with grass. Two feeding treatments were compared with a diet of TMR: grass grazed at pasture and grass cut in the field and delivered to housed cattle (termed cut-and-carry). Each feeding treatment was fed to 15 cattle, and the experiment was conducted in South-west Scotland. Using a laser methane detector, we measured a twofold and fourfold decline in enteric methane production for the cut-and-carry and grazing groups, respectively, when the animals consumed grass. TMR was consumed by both grassfed groups overnight, so daily values were adjusted to include elevated methane production during this period. This revealed that methane production for the cutand- carry and grazing groups was 17% and 39% lower than for the TMR-fed group respectively. Milk yields were maintained for all three groups, and the efficiency of milk production per unit of methane was substantially greater for the two grass-fed groups. A shift away from exclusively feeding TMR by adding fresh grass to the diets of cattle could contribute to meeting emissions targets and could also represent an economically sustainable climate change mitigation strategy.

AB - There have been reductions in grazing cattle and corresponding increases in mixed diets across many regions. Mixed diets consist of silage, grains, legumes and other herbaceous plants (termed total mixed ration, TMR). TMR has been associated with increased milk yields but has also been linked to increased enteric methane production. We measured milk yields and methane production from high-yielding Holstein- Friesian cattle after substituting 29%–36% of a TMR diet with grass. Two feeding treatments were compared with a diet of TMR: grass grazed at pasture and grass cut in the field and delivered to housed cattle (termed cut-and-carry). Each feeding treatment was fed to 15 cattle, and the experiment was conducted in South-west Scotland. Using a laser methane detector, we measured a twofold and fourfold decline in enteric methane production for the cut-and-carry and grazing groups, respectively, when the animals consumed grass. TMR was consumed by both grassfed groups overnight, so daily values were adjusted to include elevated methane production during this period. This revealed that methane production for the cutand- carry and grazing groups was 17% and 39% lower than for the TMR-fed group respectively. Milk yields were maintained for all three groups, and the efficiency of milk production per unit of methane was substantially greater for the two grass-fed groups. A shift away from exclusively feeding TMR by adding fresh grass to the diets of cattle could contribute to meeting emissions targets and could also represent an economically sustainable climate change mitigation strategy.

KW - Cut-and-carry

KW - Enteric methane

KW - Forage

KW - Greenhouse gases

KW - Zero grazing

U2 - 10.1111/gfs.12353

DO - 10.1111/gfs.12353

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 789

EP - 797

JO - Grass and Forage Science

JF - Grass and Forage Science

SN - 0142-5242

IS - 3

ER -