Abstract
Metagenomic binning has revolutionized the study of uncultured microorganisms. Here we compare single- and multi-coverage binning on the same set of samples, and demonstrate that multi-coverage binning produces better results than single-coverage binning and identifies contaminant contigs and chimeric bins that other approaches miss. While resource expensive, multi-coverage binning is a superior approach and should always be performed over single-coverage binning.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1170-1173 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Nature Methods |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Early online date | 29 Jun 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Print publication - Aug 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.Keywords
- Algorithms
- Metagenome
- Metagenomics/methods
- Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods