A framework for valuing spatially targeted peatland restoration

K Glenk, M Schaafsma, A Moxey, J Martin-Ortega, N Hanley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the degree of degradation of peatlands is substantial, and that there is a significant potential to enhance the delivery of a wide range of ecosystem services by investing in peatland restoration. However, little is known about the social welfare impacts of peatland restoration and in particular how to spatially target restoration activities to maximise net benefits from investments in restoration. This paper investigates the steps required to conduct a spatially explicit economic impact assessment of peatland restoration, and highlights and discusses key requirements and issues associated with such an assessment. We find that spatially explicit modelling of the biophysical impacts of restoration over time is challenging due to non-linear effects and interaction effects. This has repercussions for the spatially explicit assessment of costs and benefits, which in itself is a demanding task. We conclude that the gains of investing in the research needed to conduct such an assessment can be high, both in terms of advancing science and in terms of providing useful information for decision makers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20 - 33
Number of pages14
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - 2014

Fingerprint

peatland
welfare impact
economic impact
ecosystem service
restoration
cost
modeling

Bibliographical note

1023311
1023337

Keywords

  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Ecosystem services
  • Peatland restoration
  • Spatial targeting
  • Valuation

Cite this

Glenk, K ; Schaafsma, M ; Moxey, A ; Martin-Ortega, J ; Hanley, N. / A framework for valuing spatially targeted peatland restoration. In: Ecosystem Services. 2014 ; Vol. 9. pp. 20 - 33.
@article{0bfac8005d1940718953683a6c180d94,
title = "A framework for valuing spatially targeted peatland restoration",
abstract = "Recent evidence suggests that the degree of degradation of peatlands is substantial, and that there is a significant potential to enhance the delivery of a wide range of ecosystem services by investing in peatland restoration. However, little is known about the social welfare impacts of peatland restoration and in particular how to spatially target restoration activities to maximise net benefits from investments in restoration. This paper investigates the steps required to conduct a spatially explicit economic impact assessment of peatland restoration, and highlights and discusses key requirements and issues associated with such an assessment. We find that spatially explicit modelling of the biophysical impacts of restoration over time is challenging due to non-linear effects and interaction effects. This has repercussions for the spatially explicit assessment of costs and benefits, which in itself is a demanding task. We conclude that the gains of investing in the research needed to conduct such an assessment can be high, both in terms of advancing science and in terms of providing useful information for decision makers.",
keywords = "Cost-benefit analysis, Ecosystem services, Peatland restoration, Spatial targeting, Valuation",
author = "K Glenk and M Schaafsma and A Moxey and J Martin-Ortega and N Hanley",
note = "1023311 1023337",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.02.008",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "20 -- 33",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A framework for valuing spatially targeted peatland restoration. / Glenk, K; Schaafsma, M; Moxey, A; Martin-Ortega, J; Hanley, N.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 9, 2014, p. 20 - 33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for valuing spatially targeted peatland restoration

AU - Glenk, K

AU - Schaafsma, M

AU - Moxey, A

AU - Martin-Ortega, J

AU - Hanley, N

N1 - 1023311 1023337

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Recent evidence suggests that the degree of degradation of peatlands is substantial, and that there is a significant potential to enhance the delivery of a wide range of ecosystem services by investing in peatland restoration. However, little is known about the social welfare impacts of peatland restoration and in particular how to spatially target restoration activities to maximise net benefits from investments in restoration. This paper investigates the steps required to conduct a spatially explicit economic impact assessment of peatland restoration, and highlights and discusses key requirements and issues associated with such an assessment. We find that spatially explicit modelling of the biophysical impacts of restoration over time is challenging due to non-linear effects and interaction effects. This has repercussions for the spatially explicit assessment of costs and benefits, which in itself is a demanding task. We conclude that the gains of investing in the research needed to conduct such an assessment can be high, both in terms of advancing science and in terms of providing useful information for decision makers.

AB - Recent evidence suggests that the degree of degradation of peatlands is substantial, and that there is a significant potential to enhance the delivery of a wide range of ecosystem services by investing in peatland restoration. However, little is known about the social welfare impacts of peatland restoration and in particular how to spatially target restoration activities to maximise net benefits from investments in restoration. This paper investigates the steps required to conduct a spatially explicit economic impact assessment of peatland restoration, and highlights and discusses key requirements and issues associated with such an assessment. We find that spatially explicit modelling of the biophysical impacts of restoration over time is challenging due to non-linear effects and interaction effects. This has repercussions for the spatially explicit assessment of costs and benefits, which in itself is a demanding task. We conclude that the gains of investing in the research needed to conduct such an assessment can be high, both in terms of advancing science and in terms of providing useful information for decision makers.

KW - Cost-benefit analysis

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Peatland restoration

KW - Spatial targeting

KW - Valuation

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.02.008

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 20

EP - 33

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

ER -