A meta-analysis of cortisol concentration, vocalization, and average daily gain associated with castration in beef cattle

MEA Canozzi, A Mederos, X Manteca, SP Turner, C McManus, D Zago, JOJ Barcellos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) were performed to summarize all scientific evidence for the effects of castration in male beef cattle on welfare indicators based on cortisol concentration, average daily gain (ADG), and vocalization. We searched five electronic databases, conference proceedings, and experts were contacted electronically. The main inclusion criteria involved completed studies using beef cattle up to one year of age undergoing surgical and non-surgical castration that presented cortisol concentration, ADG, or vocalization as an outcome. A random effect MA was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. A total of 20 publications reporting 26 studies and 162 trials were included in the MA involving 1814 cattle. Between study heterogeneity was observed when analysing cortisol (I2 = 56.7%) and ADG (I2 = 79.6%). Surgical and non-surgical castration without drug administration compared to uncastrated animals showed no change (P ≥ 0.05) in cortisol level. Multimodal therapy for pain did not decrease (P ≥ 0.05) cortisol concentration after 30 min when non-surgical castration was performed. Comparison between surgical castration, with and without anaesthesia, showed a tendency (P = 0.077) to decrease cortisol levels after 120 min of intervention. Non-surgical and surgical castration, performed with no pain mitigation, increased and tended to increase the ADG by 0.814 g/d (P = 0.001) and by 0.140 g/d (P = 0.091), respectively, when compared to a non-castrated group. Our MA study demonstrates an inconclusive result to draw recommendations on preferred castration practices to minimize pain in beef cattle.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)430 - 443
Number of pages14
JournalResearch in Veterinary Science
Volume114
Early online date20 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 20 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Castration
Hydrocortisone
Meta-Analysis
Pain
Orchiectomy
Publications
Anesthesia
Databases
Control Groups
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Bibliographical note

1032231

Keywords

  • Analgesia
  • Animal welfare
  • Pain

Cite this

Canozzi, MEA ; Mederos, A ; Manteca, X ; Turner, SP ; McManus, C ; Zago, D ; Barcellos, JOJ. / A meta-analysis of cortisol concentration, vocalization, and average daily gain associated with castration in beef cattle. In: Research in Veterinary Science. 2017 ; Vol. 114. pp. 430 - 443.
@article{75fd646e1ee44697abef3a607c80856d,
title = "A meta-analysis of cortisol concentration, vocalization, and average daily gain associated with castration in beef cattle",
abstract = "A systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) were performed to summarize all scientific evidence for the effects of castration in male beef cattle on welfare indicators based on cortisol concentration, average daily gain (ADG), and vocalization. We searched five electronic databases, conference proceedings, and experts were contacted electronically. The main inclusion criteria involved completed studies using beef cattle up to one year of age undergoing surgical and non-surgical castration that presented cortisol concentration, ADG, or vocalization as an outcome. A random effect MA was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. A total of 20 publications reporting 26 studies and 162 trials were included in the MA involving 1814 cattle. Between study heterogeneity was observed when analysing cortisol (I2 = 56.7{\%}) and ADG (I2 = 79.6{\%}). Surgical and non-surgical castration without drug administration compared to uncastrated animals showed no change (P ≥ 0.05) in cortisol level. Multimodal therapy for pain did not decrease (P ≥ 0.05) cortisol concentration after 30 min when non-surgical castration was performed. Comparison between surgical castration, with and without anaesthesia, showed a tendency (P = 0.077) to decrease cortisol levels after 120 min of intervention. Non-surgical and surgical castration, performed with no pain mitigation, increased and tended to increase the ADG by 0.814 g/d (P = 0.001) and by 0.140 g/d (P = 0.091), respectively, when compared to a non-castrated group. Our MA study demonstrates an inconclusive result to draw recommendations on preferred castration practices to minimize pain in beef cattle.",
keywords = "Analgesia, Animal welfare, Pain",
author = "MEA Canozzi and A Mederos and X Manteca and SP Turner and C McManus and D Zago and JOJ Barcellos",
note = "1032231",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.014",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "430 -- 443",
journal = "Research in Veterinary Science",
issn = "0034-5288",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A meta-analysis of cortisol concentration, vocalization, and average daily gain associated with castration in beef cattle. / Canozzi, MEA; Mederos, A; Manteca, X; Turner, SP; McManus, C; Zago, D; Barcellos, JOJ.

In: Research in Veterinary Science, Vol. 114, 20.07.2017, p. 430 - 443.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis of cortisol concentration, vocalization, and average daily gain associated with castration in beef cattle

AU - Canozzi, MEA

AU - Mederos, A

AU - Manteca, X

AU - Turner, SP

AU - McManus, C

AU - Zago, D

AU - Barcellos, JOJ

N1 - 1032231

PY - 2017/7/20

Y1 - 2017/7/20

N2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) were performed to summarize all scientific evidence for the effects of castration in male beef cattle on welfare indicators based on cortisol concentration, average daily gain (ADG), and vocalization. We searched five electronic databases, conference proceedings, and experts were contacted electronically. The main inclusion criteria involved completed studies using beef cattle up to one year of age undergoing surgical and non-surgical castration that presented cortisol concentration, ADG, or vocalization as an outcome. A random effect MA was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. A total of 20 publications reporting 26 studies and 162 trials were included in the MA involving 1814 cattle. Between study heterogeneity was observed when analysing cortisol (I2 = 56.7%) and ADG (I2 = 79.6%). Surgical and non-surgical castration without drug administration compared to uncastrated animals showed no change (P ≥ 0.05) in cortisol level. Multimodal therapy for pain did not decrease (P ≥ 0.05) cortisol concentration after 30 min when non-surgical castration was performed. Comparison between surgical castration, with and without anaesthesia, showed a tendency (P = 0.077) to decrease cortisol levels after 120 min of intervention. Non-surgical and surgical castration, performed with no pain mitigation, increased and tended to increase the ADG by 0.814 g/d (P = 0.001) and by 0.140 g/d (P = 0.091), respectively, when compared to a non-castrated group. Our MA study demonstrates an inconclusive result to draw recommendations on preferred castration practices to minimize pain in beef cattle.

AB - A systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) were performed to summarize all scientific evidence for the effects of castration in male beef cattle on welfare indicators based on cortisol concentration, average daily gain (ADG), and vocalization. We searched five electronic databases, conference proceedings, and experts were contacted electronically. The main inclusion criteria involved completed studies using beef cattle up to one year of age undergoing surgical and non-surgical castration that presented cortisol concentration, ADG, or vocalization as an outcome. A random effect MA was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. A total of 20 publications reporting 26 studies and 162 trials were included in the MA involving 1814 cattle. Between study heterogeneity was observed when analysing cortisol (I2 = 56.7%) and ADG (I2 = 79.6%). Surgical and non-surgical castration without drug administration compared to uncastrated animals showed no change (P ≥ 0.05) in cortisol level. Multimodal therapy for pain did not decrease (P ≥ 0.05) cortisol concentration after 30 min when non-surgical castration was performed. Comparison between surgical castration, with and without anaesthesia, showed a tendency (P = 0.077) to decrease cortisol levels after 120 min of intervention. Non-surgical and surgical castration, performed with no pain mitigation, increased and tended to increase the ADG by 0.814 g/d (P = 0.001) and by 0.140 g/d (P = 0.091), respectively, when compared to a non-castrated group. Our MA study demonstrates an inconclusive result to draw recommendations on preferred castration practices to minimize pain in beef cattle.

KW - Analgesia

KW - Animal welfare

KW - Pain

U2 - 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.014

DO - 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.014

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 430

EP - 443

JO - Research in Veterinary Science

JF - Research in Veterinary Science

SN - 0034-5288

ER -