A review of pain assessment in pigs

SH Ison, RE Clutton, P Di Giminiani, KMD Rutherford

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Research › peer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is a moral obligation to minimize pain in pigs used for human benefit. In livestock production, pigs experience pain caused by management procedures, e.g., castration and tail docking, injuries from fighting or poor housing conditions, “management diseases” like mastitis or streptococcal meningitis, and at parturition. Pigs used in biomedical research undergo procedures that are regarded as painful in humans, but do not receive similar levels of analgesia, and pet pigs also experience potentially painful conditions. In all contexts, accurate pain assessment is a prerequisite in (a) the estimation of the welfare consequences of noxious interventions and (b) the development of more effective pain mitigation strategies. This narrative review identifies the sources of pain in pigs, discusses the various assessment measures currently available, and proposes directions for future investigation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8 - 5
Number of pages2
JournalFrontiers in Veterinary Science
Volume3
Early online date28 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 28 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

Pain Measurement
Swine
Moral Obligations
Pain
Mastitis
Pets
Pain Management
Meningitis
Analgesia
Tail
Parturition
Wounds and Injuries
Research

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Pain assessment
  • Pig
  • Review
  • Welfare

Cite this

Ison, SH ; Clutton, RE ; Di Giminiani, P ; Rutherford, KMD. / A review of pain assessment in pigs. In: Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2016 ; Vol. 3. pp. 8 - 5.
@article{eeb4e6449abe4be78eedd24fefa664d3,
title = "A review of pain assessment in pigs",
abstract = "There is a moral obligation to minimize pain in pigs used for human benefit. In livestock production, pigs experience pain caused by management procedures, e.g., castration and tail docking, injuries from fighting or poor housing conditions, “management diseases” like mastitis or streptococcal meningitis, and at parturition. Pigs used in biomedical research undergo procedures that are regarded as painful in humans, but do not receive similar levels of analgesia, and pet pigs also experience potentially painful conditions. In all contexts, accurate pain assessment is a prerequisite in (a) the estimation of the welfare consequences of noxious interventions and (b) the development of more effective pain mitigation strategies. This narrative review identifies the sources of pain in pigs, discusses the various assessment measures currently available, and proposes directions for future investigation.",
keywords = "Pain, Pain assessment, Pig, Review, Welfare",
author = "SH Ison and RE Clutton and {Di Giminiani}, P and KMD Rutherford",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.3389/fvets.2016.00108",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "8 -- 5",
journal = "Frontiers in Veterinary Science",
issn = "2297-1769",
publisher = "Frontiers Media",

}

Ison, SH, Clutton, RE, Di Giminiani, P & Rutherford, KMD 2016, 'A review of pain assessment in pigs', Frontiers in Veterinary Science, vol. 3, pp. 8 - 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00108

A review of pain assessment in pigs. / Ison, SH; Clutton, RE; Di Giminiani, P; Rutherford, KMD.

In: Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Vol. 3, 28.11.2016, p. 8 - 5.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Research › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of pain assessment in pigs

AU - Ison, SH

AU - Clutton, RE

AU - Di Giminiani, P

AU - Rutherford, KMD

PY - 2016/11/28

Y1 - 2016/11/28

N2 - There is a moral obligation to minimize pain in pigs used for human benefit. In livestock production, pigs experience pain caused by management procedures, e.g., castration and tail docking, injuries from fighting or poor housing conditions, “management diseases” like mastitis or streptococcal meningitis, and at parturition. Pigs used in biomedical research undergo procedures that are regarded as painful in humans, but do not receive similar levels of analgesia, and pet pigs also experience potentially painful conditions. In all contexts, accurate pain assessment is a prerequisite in (a) the estimation of the welfare consequences of noxious interventions and (b) the development of more effective pain mitigation strategies. This narrative review identifies the sources of pain in pigs, discusses the various assessment measures currently available, and proposes directions for future investigation.

AB - There is a moral obligation to minimize pain in pigs used for human benefit. In livestock production, pigs experience pain caused by management procedures, e.g., castration and tail docking, injuries from fighting or poor housing conditions, “management diseases” like mastitis or streptococcal meningitis, and at parturition. Pigs used in biomedical research undergo procedures that are regarded as painful in humans, but do not receive similar levels of analgesia, and pet pigs also experience potentially painful conditions. In all contexts, accurate pain assessment is a prerequisite in (a) the estimation of the welfare consequences of noxious interventions and (b) the development of more effective pain mitigation strategies. This narrative review identifies the sources of pain in pigs, discusses the various assessment measures currently available, and proposes directions for future investigation.

KW - Pain

KW - Pain assessment

KW - Pig

KW - Review

KW - Welfare

U2 - 10.3389/fvets.2016.00108

DO - 10.3389/fvets.2016.00108

M3 - Review article

VL - 3

SP - 8

EP - 5

JO - Frontiers in Veterinary Science

JF - Frontiers in Veterinary Science

SN - 2297-1769

ER -

Ison SH, Clutton RE, Di Giminiani P, Rutherford KMD. A review of pain assessment in pigs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2016 Nov 28;3:8 - 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00108

Access to Document