A web survey application of real choice experiments

U Liebe*, K Glenk, M von Mayer-Hofer, A Spiller

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This research note presents the first study to implement a real choice experiment in a web survey. In a case study on ethical food consumption, we find statistically significant lower willingness-to-pay values for the attributes “organic production” and “fair trade” in a choice experiment involving real payments compared to a choice experiment without real payments. This holds only true for respondents who are prepared to provide their personal details in order to deliver the product (83% of the sample), providing further evidence that lack of consequentiality can be an important source of validity problems. The implementation of a real choice experiment online proves useful and can form the baseline for future tests of the effectiveness of ex ante approaches such as cheap talk or honesty priming as well as consequentiality scripts in web-based choice experiments.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100150
JournalJournal of Choice Modelling
Volume33
Early online date31 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Choice experiment
Web survey
Payment
Food consumption
Priming
Cheap talk
Web-based
Honesty
Fair trade
Organic production
Willingness-to-pay

Bibliographical note

1020301

Keywords

  • Consequentiality
  • Ethical food consumption
  • Hypothetical bias
  • Stated preferences
  • Validity
  • Willingness to pay

Cite this

Liebe, U ; Glenk, K ; von Mayer-Hofer, M ; Spiller, A. / A web survey application of real choice experiments. In: Journal of Choice Modelling. 2019 ; Vol. 33.
@article{e157cca794b44bf1a43211200942ec62,
title = "A web survey application of real choice experiments",
abstract = "This research note presents the first study to implement a real choice experiment in a web survey. In a case study on ethical food consumption, we find statistically significant lower willingness-to-pay values for the attributes “organic production” and “fair trade” in a choice experiment involving real payments compared to a choice experiment without real payments. This holds only true for respondents who are prepared to provide their personal details in order to deliver the product (83{\%} of the sample), providing further evidence that lack of consequentiality can be an important source of validity problems. The implementation of a real choice experiment online proves useful and can form the baseline for future tests of the effectiveness of ex ante approaches such as cheap talk or honesty priming as well as consequentiality scripts in web-based choice experiments.",
keywords = "Consequentiality, Ethical food consumption, Hypothetical bias, Stated preferences, Validity, Willingness to pay",
author = "U Liebe and K Glenk and {von Mayer-Hofer}, M and A Spiller",
note = "1020301",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocm.2018.07.003",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
journal = "Journal of Choice Modelling",
issn = "1755-5345",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

A web survey application of real choice experiments. / Liebe, U; Glenk, K; von Mayer-Hofer, M; Spiller, A.

In: Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 33, 100150, 12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A web survey application of real choice experiments

AU - Liebe, U

AU - Glenk, K

AU - von Mayer-Hofer, M

AU - Spiller, A

N1 - 1020301

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - This research note presents the first study to implement a real choice experiment in a web survey. In a case study on ethical food consumption, we find statistically significant lower willingness-to-pay values for the attributes “organic production” and “fair trade” in a choice experiment involving real payments compared to a choice experiment without real payments. This holds only true for respondents who are prepared to provide their personal details in order to deliver the product (83% of the sample), providing further evidence that lack of consequentiality can be an important source of validity problems. The implementation of a real choice experiment online proves useful and can form the baseline for future tests of the effectiveness of ex ante approaches such as cheap talk or honesty priming as well as consequentiality scripts in web-based choice experiments.

AB - This research note presents the first study to implement a real choice experiment in a web survey. In a case study on ethical food consumption, we find statistically significant lower willingness-to-pay values for the attributes “organic production” and “fair trade” in a choice experiment involving real payments compared to a choice experiment without real payments. This holds only true for respondents who are prepared to provide their personal details in order to deliver the product (83% of the sample), providing further evidence that lack of consequentiality can be an important source of validity problems. The implementation of a real choice experiment online proves useful and can form the baseline for future tests of the effectiveness of ex ante approaches such as cheap talk or honesty priming as well as consequentiality scripts in web-based choice experiments.

KW - Consequentiality

KW - Ethical food consumption

KW - Hypothetical bias

KW - Stated preferences

KW - Validity

KW - Willingness to pay

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocm.2018.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jocm.2018.07.003

M3 - Article

VL - 33

JO - Journal of Choice Modelling

JF - Journal of Choice Modelling

SN - 1755-5345

M1 - 100150

ER -