Aegilops

Benjamin Kilian, Kerstin Mammen, Eitan Millet, Rajiv Sharma, Andreas Graner, Francesco Salamini, Karl Hammer, Hakan Özkan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In spite of more than 200 years of botanical exploration of the Orient, resulting in many herbaria and germplasm collections, sequence data, and transferred alleles, our knowledge on the genus Aegilops is far from complete. Several aspects concerning the genus Aegilops L. will be reviewed in this chapter. We consider 23 annual species and follow in their classification the monographs of Hammer (Kulturpflanze 28:33–180, 1980a; Feddes Rep 91:225–258, 1980b) and van Slageren (Wild wheats: a monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub. & Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Agricultural University Papers, Wageningen, Netherlands, 1994). We show that Aegilops species have been closely involved in wheat evolution, played a major role in wheat domestication, and will play a critical role in future wheat improvement. We show that the keys to obtain deeper insights to Aegilops genetic diversity, Aegilops–Triticum molecular biological relationships, and to harvest and preserve suitable alleles for future wheat improvement are (1) a comprehensive germplasm collection covering the whole distribution area of each species; (2) the comparison of several accessions for each species considering all ploidy levels; (3) the use of new molecular fingerprinting techniques and the access to high-throughput sequencing technologies; (4) the improvement of analytical methods capable of treating various issues based on mathematical and statistical models, and (5) archeological excavation campaigns should also consider studies on Aegilops species. We urgently need detailed studies for each Aegilops species dealing with natural distribution range, ecology, soil, geomorphology, molecular resources, and genome sequences. There is an urgent need for an active in situ conservation to protect Aegilops species in their natural habitats.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources
EditorsChittaranjan Kole
Place of PublicationHeidelberg
PublisherSpringer Berlin Heidelberg
Chapter1
Pages1-76
Number of pages76
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-642-14228-4
ISBN (Print)978-3-642-14227-7
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameWild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources

Fingerprint

Aegilops
wheat
germplasm conservation
Amblyopyrum
soil ecology
alleles
geomorphology
agricultural colleges
domestication
statistical models
ploidy
herbaria
Poaceae
analytical methods
preserves
Netherlands
geographical distribution
mathematical models
taxonomy
genetic variation

Cite this

Kilian, B., Mammen, K., Millet, E., Sharma, R., Graner, A., Salamini, F., ... Özkan, H. (2011). Aegilops. In C. Kole (Ed.), Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources (pp. 1-76). (Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14228-4_1
Kilian, Benjamin ; Mammen, Kerstin ; Millet, Eitan ; Sharma, Rajiv ; Graner, Andreas ; Salamini, Francesco ; Hammer, Karl ; Özkan, Hakan. / Aegilops. Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources. editor / Chittaranjan Kole. Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. pp. 1-76 (Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources).
@inbook{db94335d1c2e4ba1a4d27187762b0b88,
title = "Aegilops",
abstract = "In spite of more than 200 years of botanical exploration of the Orient, resulting in many herbaria and germplasm collections, sequence data, and transferred alleles, our knowledge on the genus Aegilops is far from complete. Several aspects concerning the genus Aegilops L. will be reviewed in this chapter. We consider 23 annual species and follow in their classification the monographs of Hammer (Kulturpflanze 28:33–180, 1980a; Feddes Rep 91:225–258, 1980b) and van Slageren (Wild wheats: a monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub. & Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Agricultural University Papers, Wageningen, Netherlands, 1994). We show that Aegilops species have been closely involved in wheat evolution, played a major role in wheat domestication, and will play a critical role in future wheat improvement. We show that the keys to obtain deeper insights to Aegilops genetic diversity, Aegilops–Triticum molecular biological relationships, and to harvest and preserve suitable alleles for future wheat improvement are (1) a comprehensive germplasm collection covering the whole distribution area of each species; (2) the comparison of several accessions for each species considering all ploidy levels; (3) the use of new molecular fingerprinting techniques and the access to high-throughput sequencing technologies; (4) the improvement of analytical methods capable of treating various issues based on mathematical and statistical models, and (5) archeological excavation campaigns should also consider studies on Aegilops species. We urgently need detailed studies for each Aegilops species dealing with natural distribution range, ecology, soil, geomorphology, molecular resources, and genome sequences. There is an urgent need for an active in situ conservation to protect Aegilops species in their natural habitats.",
author = "Benjamin Kilian and Kerstin Mammen and Eitan Millet and Rajiv Sharma and Andreas Graner and Francesco Salamini and Karl Hammer and Hakan {\"O}zkan",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-14228-4_1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-642-14227-7",
series = "Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources",
publisher = "Springer Berlin Heidelberg",
pages = "1--76",
editor = "Kole, {Chittaranjan }",
booktitle = "Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources",

}

Kilian, B, Mammen, K, Millet, E, Sharma, R, Graner, A, Salamini, F, Hammer, K & Özkan, H 2011, Aegilops. in C Kole (ed.), Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources. Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg, pp. 1-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14228-4_1

Aegilops. / Kilian, Benjamin; Mammen, Kerstin; Millet, Eitan; Sharma, Rajiv; Graner, Andreas; Salamini, Francesco; Hammer, Karl; Özkan, Hakan.

Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources. ed. / Chittaranjan Kole. Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. p. 1-76 (Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Aegilops

AU - Kilian, Benjamin

AU - Mammen, Kerstin

AU - Millet, Eitan

AU - Sharma, Rajiv

AU - Graner, Andreas

AU - Salamini, Francesco

AU - Hammer, Karl

AU - Özkan, Hakan

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In spite of more than 200 years of botanical exploration of the Orient, resulting in many herbaria and germplasm collections, sequence data, and transferred alleles, our knowledge on the genus Aegilops is far from complete. Several aspects concerning the genus Aegilops L. will be reviewed in this chapter. We consider 23 annual species and follow in their classification the monographs of Hammer (Kulturpflanze 28:33–180, 1980a; Feddes Rep 91:225–258, 1980b) and van Slageren (Wild wheats: a monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub. & Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Agricultural University Papers, Wageningen, Netherlands, 1994). We show that Aegilops species have been closely involved in wheat evolution, played a major role in wheat domestication, and will play a critical role in future wheat improvement. We show that the keys to obtain deeper insights to Aegilops genetic diversity, Aegilops–Triticum molecular biological relationships, and to harvest and preserve suitable alleles for future wheat improvement are (1) a comprehensive germplasm collection covering the whole distribution area of each species; (2) the comparison of several accessions for each species considering all ploidy levels; (3) the use of new molecular fingerprinting techniques and the access to high-throughput sequencing technologies; (4) the improvement of analytical methods capable of treating various issues based on mathematical and statistical models, and (5) archeological excavation campaigns should also consider studies on Aegilops species. We urgently need detailed studies for each Aegilops species dealing with natural distribution range, ecology, soil, geomorphology, molecular resources, and genome sequences. There is an urgent need for an active in situ conservation to protect Aegilops species in their natural habitats.

AB - In spite of more than 200 years of botanical exploration of the Orient, resulting in many herbaria and germplasm collections, sequence data, and transferred alleles, our knowledge on the genus Aegilops is far from complete. Several aspects concerning the genus Aegilops L. will be reviewed in this chapter. We consider 23 annual species and follow in their classification the monographs of Hammer (Kulturpflanze 28:33–180, 1980a; Feddes Rep 91:225–258, 1980b) and van Slageren (Wild wheats: a monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub. & Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Agricultural University Papers, Wageningen, Netherlands, 1994). We show that Aegilops species have been closely involved in wheat evolution, played a major role in wheat domestication, and will play a critical role in future wheat improvement. We show that the keys to obtain deeper insights to Aegilops genetic diversity, Aegilops–Triticum molecular biological relationships, and to harvest and preserve suitable alleles for future wheat improvement are (1) a comprehensive germplasm collection covering the whole distribution area of each species; (2) the comparison of several accessions for each species considering all ploidy levels; (3) the use of new molecular fingerprinting techniques and the access to high-throughput sequencing technologies; (4) the improvement of analytical methods capable of treating various issues based on mathematical and statistical models, and (5) archeological excavation campaigns should also consider studies on Aegilops species. We urgently need detailed studies for each Aegilops species dealing with natural distribution range, ecology, soil, geomorphology, molecular resources, and genome sequences. There is an urgent need for an active in situ conservation to protect Aegilops species in their natural habitats.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/aegilops

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-14228-4_1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-14228-4_1

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-642-14227-7

T3 - Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources

SP - 1

EP - 76

BT - Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources

A2 - Kole, Chittaranjan

PB - Springer Berlin Heidelberg

CY - Heidelberg

ER -

Kilian B, Mammen K, Millet E, Sharma R, Graner A, Salamini F et al. Aegilops. In Kole C, editor, Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2011. p. 1-76. (Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14228-4_1