Abstract
This paper presents an estimate of the benefits of the proposed designation of a network of marine conservation
zones (MCZs) in English territorial and UK offshore waters. This ex ante analysis was undertaken as
part of a cost–benefit evidence base to inform implementation of the proposed UK Marine and Coastal Access
Bill. This Bill is part of an ambitious plan to designate and manage UK marine areas using an Ecosystems
Approach. Benefits are measured in terms of anticipated increases in the value of ecosystem goods and services
provisioned by MCZs relative to the counterfactual, i.e. no designation. The principal valuation and thus policy
challenge is presented by the need to use benefits transfer in a context where biophysical provisioning
functions are not well-developed, where there are gaps in the valuation literature related to temperate marine
ecosystem goods and services, and where values (where available) are presented in aggregate terms. This
paper develops and applies a methodology that first apportions these aggregate benefits across the diverse
range of marine landscapes and habitats and then estimates the marginal benefit of protection. The value of
benefits was calculated for three different configurations of MCZs under two different management regimes.
Weestimate a benefit range from designation of between £10.2 billion and £23.5 billion in present value terms,
applying a 3.5% discount rate. The study questions the extent to which a defensible policy evidence base can be
developed in the absence of primary valuation data and where benefit estimates are reported in aggregate
terms.
© 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 828 - 838 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Ecological Economics |
Volume | 69 |
Publication status | First published - 2010 |
Bibliographical note
1021837Keywords
- Areas valuation
- Benefits transfer
- Ecosystem services approach
- Marine protected areas