Abstract
Conflicting findings have been found in previous research that compared choice-based conjoint analysis and ranking conjoint analysis in a public good setting. The present paper revisits this issue for a private good in a non-hypothetical context using small and large choice sets. Our results suggest that in a small choice set setting, participants’ preferences and willingness to pay are similar across the two conjoint analysis formats. However, in large choice sets, a divergence between the two conjoint analysis formats emerges. Hence, the two conjoint analysis formats can only be used interchangeably in small choice sets, not in large choice sets.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1 - 15 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | American Journal of Agricultural Economics |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 23 May 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Print publication - Jul 2013 |
Keywords
- Conjoint analysis
- Non-hypothetical settings
- Small and large choice sets
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Are results from non-hypothetical choice-based conjoint analysis and non-hypothetical recoded-ranking conjoint analyses similar?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver