Are there trade-offs in valuation with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, origin and food miles attributes?

F Akaichi, RM, Jr Nayga, LL Nalley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study measures consumers’ willingness to pay for the attributes Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions during production, food miles, and origin (local/non-local) of rice products and assesses the interaction effects (complementarities and substitutions) between these food attributes, using a non-hypothetical experimental auction. Results typically show that consumers are willing to pay a price premium for rice that has lower GHG emissions and/or lower food miles and/or is local. Most importantly, consumers were found to trade off these three food attributes. The results also show that consumers do not perceive the attributes food miles and origin as perfect substitutes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3 - 31
Number of pages29
JournalEuropean Review of Agricultural Economics
Volume44
Issue number1
Early online date17 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - 1 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Greenhouse gas emissions
Trade-offs
Food
Willingness-to-pay
Substitution
Interaction effects
Premium
Substitute
Experimental auctions
Complementarity
Food production

Keywords

  • Food miles
  • GHG emissions
  • Local
  • Trade-offs
  • Willingness to pay

Cite this

@article{8a20f1c0deb94a9d9011cb24cfb7b5b4,
title = "Are there trade-offs in valuation with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, origin and food miles attributes?",
abstract = "This study measures consumers’ willingness to pay for the attributes Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions during production, food miles, and origin (local/non-local) of rice products and assesses the interaction effects (complementarities and substitutions) between these food attributes, using a non-hypothetical experimental auction. Results typically show that consumers are willing to pay a price premium for rice that has lower GHG emissions and/or lower food miles and/or is local. Most importantly, consumers were found to trade off these three food attributes. The results also show that consumers do not perceive the attributes food miles and origin as perfect substitutes.",
keywords = "Food miles, GHG emissions, Local, Trade-offs, Willingness to pay",
author = "F Akaichi and Nayga, {RM, Jr} and LL Nalley",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/erae/jbw008",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "3 -- 31",
journal = "European Review of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0165-1587",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Are there trade-offs in valuation with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, origin and food miles attributes? / Akaichi, F; Nayga, RM, Jr; Nalley, LL.

In: European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. 3 - 31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are there trade-offs in valuation with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, origin and food miles attributes?

AU - Akaichi, F

AU - Nayga, RM, Jr

AU - Nalley, LL

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - This study measures consumers’ willingness to pay for the attributes Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions during production, food miles, and origin (local/non-local) of rice products and assesses the interaction effects (complementarities and substitutions) between these food attributes, using a non-hypothetical experimental auction. Results typically show that consumers are willing to pay a price premium for rice that has lower GHG emissions and/or lower food miles and/or is local. Most importantly, consumers were found to trade off these three food attributes. The results also show that consumers do not perceive the attributes food miles and origin as perfect substitutes.

AB - This study measures consumers’ willingness to pay for the attributes Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions during production, food miles, and origin (local/non-local) of rice products and assesses the interaction effects (complementarities and substitutions) between these food attributes, using a non-hypothetical experimental auction. Results typically show that consumers are willing to pay a price premium for rice that has lower GHG emissions and/or lower food miles and/or is local. Most importantly, consumers were found to trade off these three food attributes. The results also show that consumers do not perceive the attributes food miles and origin as perfect substitutes.

KW - Food miles

KW - GHG emissions

KW - Local

KW - Trade-offs

KW - Willingness to pay

U2 - 10.1093/erae/jbw008

DO - 10.1093/erae/jbw008

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 3

EP - 31

JO - European Review of Agricultural Economics

JF - European Review of Agricultural Economics

SN - 0165-1587

IS - 1

ER -