Abstract
What were we trying to find out?Scotland has a suite of different policies relating to land use, reflecting the complexities of balancing different land-use aims, including food production and forestry, environmental protection, climate change mitigation and socio-economic benefits. This research explored the relative influence of different land-use policies on the decision-making processes of a range of different key stakeholders.What did we do?We used Q methodology, which involves participants ranking different land-use policies based on their influence on land-use decisions and their ability to achieve their land-use goals. Organisations with direct influence over land-use decisions and membership organisations (whose members managed land and made land-use decisions) were interviewed. Interviews with 12 organisations were conducted between February – March 2024.What did we learn?The analysis identified 5 distinct representative perspectives (factors) on the influence of land-use policies on decision-making processes: Conservationists, Public and Community Interests, Food Producers, Private Interests, and Crofting Interests. There was a high degree of divergence between these perspectives underscoring the contested nature of land-use aims and consequently the land-use policy landscape in Scotland. Key themes emerging from the analysis highlighted the high degree of influence attributed to incentive-based legislation and financial support, the impact of uncertainty, complexity, and lack of clarity within the policy landscape, and a preference for landscape-scale approaches to promote holistic land management strategies.What do we recommend?The recommendations include establishing a clear framework for subsidies and financial incentives in the Agriculture and Rural Communities (Scotland) Bill1, enhancing advisory and knowledge exchange services to support sustainable land-use practices and navigate policy complexities, implement landscape scale approaches which can combine democratically informed landscape scale land-use with targeted regulations and environmental protections. Such a model could be explored in the context of the Scottish Government’s commitment to designating at least one new National Park by 2026.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 24 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Print publication - 12 Nov 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the relative influence of land-use policies on land managers.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
RESAS 22-27: SRUC-c3-2 Modelling The Socio-economic, Greenhouse Gas And Natural Capital Impacts Of Land Use Policy And Opportunities?. *joint With SRUC-d5-3
McVittie, A. (PI), Thomson, S. (CoI), Shrestha, S. (CoI), Botero Degiovanni, H. (CoI), MacLeod, M. (CoI), Hamilton, A. (CoI), Eory, V. (CoI), Shrestha, S. (CoI), Topp, K. (CoI), Thomson, S. (CoI), Holland, J. (CoI), McCracken, D. (CoI), Gibson-Poole, S. (CoI), McMillan, J. (CoI), Wall, E. (CoI), MacLeod, M. (CoI), Glendinning, J. (CoI), Merrell, I. (CoI) & Mckay Fletcher, D. (CoI)
Scottish Government: Rural & Environment Science & Analytical Services
1/04/22 → 31/03/27
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver