Assessing uncertainties in crop and pasture ensemble model simulations of productivity and N2O emissions

F Ehrhardt, J-F Soussana, G Bellocchi, P Grace, R McAullife, S Recous, R Sandor, P Smith, V Snow, MDA Migliorati, B Basso, A Bhatia, L Brilli, J Doltra, CD Dorich, L Doro, N Fitton, SJ Giacomini, B Grant, MT HarrisonSK Jones, MUF Kirschbaum, K Klumpp, P Laville, J Leonard, M Liebig, M Lieffering, R Martin, RS Massad, E Meier, L Merbold, AD Moore, V Myrgiotis, P Newton, E Pattey, S Rolinski, J Sharp, WN Smith, L Wu, Q Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Simulation models are extensively used to predict agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the uncertainties of (reduced) model ensemble simulations have not been assessed systematically for variables affecting food security and climate change mitigation, within multispecies agricultural contexts. We report an international model comparison and benchmarking exercise, showing the potential of multimodel ensembles to predict productivity and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions for wheat, maize, rice and temperate grasslands. Using a multistage modelling protocol, from blind simulations (stage 1) to partial (stages 2-4) and full calibration (stage 5), 24 process-based biogeochemical models were assessed individually or as an ensemble against long-term experimental data from four temperate grassland and five arable crop rotation sites spanning four continents. Comparisons were performed by reference to the experimental uncertainties of observed yields and N2O emissions. Results showed that across sites and crop/grassland types, 23 to 40% of the uncalibrated individual models were within two standard deviations (s.d.) of observed yields, while 42 (rice) to 96% (grasslands) of the models were within one s.d. of observed N2O emissions. At stage 1, ensembles formed by the three lowest prediction model errors (RRMSE) predicted both yields and N2O emissions within experimental uncertainties for 44 and 33% of the crop and grassland growth cycles, respectively. Partial model calibration (stages 2 to 4) markedly reduced prediction errors of the full model ensemble E-median for crop grain yields (from 36% at stage 1 down to 4% on average) and grassland productivity (from 44 to 27%) and to a lesser and more variable extent for N2O emissions. Yield-scaled N2O emissions (N2O emissions divided by crop yields) were ranked accurately by 3-model ensembles across crop species and field sites. The potential of using process-based model ensembles to predict jointly productivity and N2O emissions at field scale is discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e603 - e616
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume24
Issue number2
Early online date28 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 28 Oct 2017

Bibliographical note

1028529

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Benchmarking
  • Biogeochemical models
  • Climate change
  • Greenhouse gases
  • Nitrous oxide
  • Soil
  • Yield

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing uncertainties in crop and pasture ensemble model simulations of productivity and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Profiles

    No photo of Stephanie Jones

    Stephanie Jones

    Person: Academic contract that is research only

    Cite this

    Ehrhardt, F., Soussana, J-F., Bellocchi, G., Grace, P., McAullife, R., Recous, S., Sandor, R., Smith, P., Snow, V., Migliorati, MDA., Basso, B., Bhatia, A., Brilli, L., Doltra, J., Dorich, CD., Doro, L., Fitton, N., Giacomini, SJ., Grant, B., ... Zhang, Q. (2017). Assessing uncertainties in crop and pasture ensemble model simulations of productivity and N2O emissions. Global Change Biology, 24(2), e603 - e616. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13965