Abstract
There is a need to assess the benefits of government policy to improve the welfare of food animals. We present a
holistic, animal-centred welfare assessment method using an expert panel of independent animal welfare sci
entists linked to a survey of food shoppers’ willingness to pay (WTP) to improve welfare levels, using a 0–100
animal welfare scale. We apply this method to six food animal types in the UK and 15 different topical policy
scenarios. We find that several current production systems have welfare scores below 50 but that some of the
policy initiatives analysed could increase welfare scores substantially if implemented. We provide valuation
tables of people’s WTP to increase welfare scores for each of the six animal types. Marginal WTP was found to
diminish as welfare scores increased. WTP values are fully transferable across any policies affecting the animals
involved and are not tied to specific production practices or contexts. The UK government has been using the
method to evaluate a range of policy options to improve welfare. The method can be applied in other countries.
The method enables government policy makers to better make the case for policies to improve the welfare of food
animals and its application should lead to an increased likelihood of such policies being implemented. The
outputs can also be used to inform consumers regarding the animal welfare provenance of the food they
purchase.
holistic, animal-centred welfare assessment method using an expert panel of independent animal welfare sci
entists linked to a survey of food shoppers’ willingness to pay (WTP) to improve welfare levels, using a 0–100
animal welfare scale. We apply this method to six food animal types in the UK and 15 different topical policy
scenarios. We find that several current production systems have welfare scores below 50 but that some of the
policy initiatives analysed could increase welfare scores substantially if implemented. We provide valuation
tables of people’s WTP to increase welfare scores for each of the six animal types. Marginal WTP was found to
diminish as welfare scores increased. WTP values are fully transferable across any policies affecting the animals
involved and are not tied to specific production practices or contexts. The UK government has been using the
method to evaluate a range of policy options to improve welfare. The method can be applied in other countries.
The method enables government policy makers to better make the case for policies to improve the welfare of food
animals and its application should lead to an increased likelihood of such policies being implemented. The
outputs can also be used to inform consumers regarding the animal welfare provenance of the food they
purchase.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103145 |
| Journal | Food Policy |
| Volume | 143 |
| Early online date | 24 Jul 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | First published - 24 Jul 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s)
Keywords
- Food animal welfare
- Policy appraisal
- Valuation tool
- Welfare assessment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment and valuation of government policies to improve food animal welfare'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver