Biochar field testing in the UK: Outcomes and implications for use

Jim Hammond; Simon Shackley; Miranda Prendergast-Miller; Jason Cook; Sarah Buckingham; Valentini A. Pappa

doi:10.4155/cmt.13.3

Biochar field testing in the UK: Outcomes and implications for use

Jim Hammond^*, Simon Shackley, Miranda Prendergast-Miller, Jason Cook, Sarah Buckingham, Valentini A. Pappa

^*Corresponding author for this work

Rural Policy Centre

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of biochar field trials in temperate climate regions. Wood biochar was applied during 2009-2011 to seven field experiments on five working farms in the UK, for arable, legume, horticultural and root crops. Results: Three trials showed no significant (p > 0.05) effect on crop yield, two showed positive effects of 5-6%, one showed a very strong increase of 100% and one showed a decrease of 2-16%. A meta-analysis of effect sizes was conducted for all treatments (n = 47), which showed a significant (p < 0.05) positive effect, increasing average yield by 0.4 t ha^-1. Biochar application rates of 20 t ha^-1 or under led to the greater benefits. Conclusion: This paper shows that, in some situations, biochar can bring benefits in modern temperate farming.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	159-170
Number of pages	12
Journal	Carbon Management
Volume	4
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.3
Publication status	Print publication - 10 Apr 2013

Access to Document

10.4155/cmt.13.3

Cite this

@article{680a9058d93740c7a9c48ca796a44a8b,

title = "Biochar field testing in the UK: Outcomes and implications for use",

abstract = "Background: There is a lack of biochar field trials in temperate climate regions. Wood biochar was applied during 2009-2011 to seven field experiments on five working farms in the UK, for arable, legume, horticultural and root crops. Results: Three trials showed no significant (p > 0.05) effect on crop yield, two showed positive effects of 5-6\%, one showed a very strong increase of 100\% and one showed a decrease of 2-16\%. A meta-analysis of effect sizes was conducted for all treatments (n = 47), which showed a significant (p < 0.05) positive effect, increasing average yield by 0.4 t ha-1. Biochar application rates of 20 t ha-1 or under led to the greater benefits. Conclusion: This paper shows that, in some situations, biochar can bring benefits in modern temperate farming.",

author = "Jim Hammond and Simon Shackley and Miranda Prendergast-Miller and Jason Cook and Sarah Buckingham and Pappa, \{Valentini A.\}",

year = "2013",

month = apr,

day = "10",

doi = "10.4155/cmt.13.3",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "159--170",

journal = "Carbon Management",

issn = "1758-3004",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biochar field testing in the UK

T2 - Outcomes and implications for use

AU - Hammond, Jim

AU - Shackley, Simon

AU - Prendergast-Miller, Miranda

AU - Cook, Jason

AU - Buckingham, Sarah

AU - Pappa, Valentini A.

PY - 2013/4/10

Y1 - 2013/4/10

N2 - Background: There is a lack of biochar field trials in temperate climate regions. Wood biochar was applied during 2009-2011 to seven field experiments on five working farms in the UK, for arable, legume, horticultural and root crops. Results: Three trials showed no significant (p > 0.05) effect on crop yield, two showed positive effects of 5-6%, one showed a very strong increase of 100% and one showed a decrease of 2-16%. A meta-analysis of effect sizes was conducted for all treatments (n = 47), which showed a significant (p < 0.05) positive effect, increasing average yield by 0.4 t ha-1. Biochar application rates of 20 t ha-1 or under led to the greater benefits. Conclusion: This paper shows that, in some situations, biochar can bring benefits in modern temperate farming.

AB - Background: There is a lack of biochar field trials in temperate climate regions. Wood biochar was applied during 2009-2011 to seven field experiments on five working farms in the UK, for arable, legume, horticultural and root crops. Results: Three trials showed no significant (p > 0.05) effect on crop yield, two showed positive effects of 5-6%, one showed a very strong increase of 100% and one showed a decrease of 2-16%. A meta-analysis of effect sizes was conducted for all treatments (n = 47), which showed a significant (p < 0.05) positive effect, increasing average yield by 0.4 t ha-1. Biochar application rates of 20 t ha-1 or under led to the greater benefits. Conclusion: This paper shows that, in some situations, biochar can bring benefits in modern temperate farming.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84875461492

U2 - 10.4155/cmt.13.3

DO - 10.4155/cmt.13.3

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84875461492

SN - 1758-3004

VL - 4

SP - 159

EP - 170

JO - Carbon Management

JF - Carbon Management

IS - 2

ER -

Biochar field testing in the UK: Outcomes and implications for use

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this