Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: review and implications for food policy

M Costa-Font, JM Gil, WB Traill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

271 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An increasing set of evidence has been reported on how consumers could potentially react to the introduction of genetically modified food. Studies typically contain some empirical evidence and some theoretical explanations of the data, however, to date limited effort has been posed on systematically reviewing the existing evidence and its implications for policy. This paper contributes to the literature by bringing together the published evidence on the behavioural frameworks and evidence on the process leading to the public acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food and organisms (GMOs). In doing so, we employ a set of clearly defined search tools and a limited number of comprehensive key words. The study attempts to gather an understanding of the published findings on the determinants of the valuation of GM food – both in terms of willingness to accept and the willing-to-pay a premium for non-GM food, trust with information sources on the safety and public health and ultimate attitudes underpinning such evidence. Furthermore, in the light of such evidence, we formulate some policy strategies to deal with public uncertainly regarding to GMOs and, especially GM food.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-111
JournalFood Policy
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - Apr 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Genetically Modified Food
food policy
genetically modified foods
Nutrition Policy
consumer acceptance
valuation
acceptance
food
evidence
Genetically Modified Organisms
Attitude to Health
Food
policy strategy
information sources
Public Health
public health
Safety
Food policy
Genetically modified food
Acceptance

Cite this

@article{a661b7cf4c6b4a6da27aeb72cef4e901,
title = "Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: review and implications for food policy",
abstract = "An increasing set of evidence has been reported on how consumers could potentially react to the introduction of genetically modified food. Studies typically contain some empirical evidence and some theoretical explanations of the data, however, to date limited effort has been posed on systematically reviewing the existing evidence and its implications for policy. This paper contributes to the literature by bringing together the published evidence on the behavioural frameworks and evidence on the process leading to the public acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food and organisms (GMOs). In doing so, we employ a set of clearly defined search tools and a limited number of comprehensive key words. The study attempts to gather an understanding of the published findings on the determinants of the valuation of GM food – both in terms of willingness to accept and the willing-to-pay a premium for non-GM food, trust with information sources on the safety and public health and ultimate attitudes underpinning such evidence. Furthermore, in the light of such evidence, we formulate some policy strategies to deal with public uncertainly regarding to GMOs and, especially GM food.",
author = "M Costa-Font and JM Gil and WB Traill",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "99--111",
journal = "Food Policy",
issn = "0306-9192",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: review and implications for food policy. / Costa-Font, M; Gil, JM; Traill, WB.

In: Food Policy, Vol. 33, No. 2, 04.2008, p. 99-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: review and implications for food policy

AU - Costa-Font, M

AU - Gil, JM

AU - Traill, WB

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - An increasing set of evidence has been reported on how consumers could potentially react to the introduction of genetically modified food. Studies typically contain some empirical evidence and some theoretical explanations of the data, however, to date limited effort has been posed on systematically reviewing the existing evidence and its implications for policy. This paper contributes to the literature by bringing together the published evidence on the behavioural frameworks and evidence on the process leading to the public acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food and organisms (GMOs). In doing so, we employ a set of clearly defined search tools and a limited number of comprehensive key words. The study attempts to gather an understanding of the published findings on the determinants of the valuation of GM food – both in terms of willingness to accept and the willing-to-pay a premium for non-GM food, trust with information sources on the safety and public health and ultimate attitudes underpinning such evidence. Furthermore, in the light of such evidence, we formulate some policy strategies to deal with public uncertainly regarding to GMOs and, especially GM food.

AB - An increasing set of evidence has been reported on how consumers could potentially react to the introduction of genetically modified food. Studies typically contain some empirical evidence and some theoretical explanations of the data, however, to date limited effort has been posed on systematically reviewing the existing evidence and its implications for policy. This paper contributes to the literature by bringing together the published evidence on the behavioural frameworks and evidence on the process leading to the public acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food and organisms (GMOs). In doing so, we employ a set of clearly defined search tools and a limited number of comprehensive key words. The study attempts to gather an understanding of the published findings on the determinants of the valuation of GM food – both in terms of willingness to accept and the willing-to-pay a premium for non-GM food, trust with information sources on the safety and public health and ultimate attitudes underpinning such evidence. Furthermore, in the light of such evidence, we formulate some policy strategies to deal with public uncertainly regarding to GMOs and, especially GM food.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-38649095603&partnerID=MN8TOARS

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 99

EP - 111

JO - Food Policy

JF - Food Policy

SN - 0306-9192

IS - 2

ER -