Abstract
This article describes the assumptions and calculations underlying
best estimates of the direct and indirect costs of three salmonid diseases
in the United Kingdom: infectious salmon anaemia (ISA),
viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS), and infectious haemorrhagic
necrosis (IHN) using a standardized spreadsheet-based
model. The data input for the model was derived from the literature
and from a small survey specifically conducted to obtain the
additional information required. The costs of private and public
surveillance, treatment, prevention, and eradication of the known
outbreaks of ISA and VHS, and a simulated outbreak of IHN,
were estimated. The average current costs of all aquaculture disease
surveillance and control by the private and public sectors
averaged £17.6 million per annum, of which the private sector
share of expenditure averaged 80% per annum. Specific disease
surveillance and control costs for three diseases ranged between
£4.7 million and £5.6 million per annum. While the current literature
supports the concept that indirect costs (such as export trade
restriction and consumer response to disease outbreak) have the
capacity to cause major losses in the industry, the indication in our
model is that the magnitude of indirect costs for salmonid disease
outbreak is not significant.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 118 - 136 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Aquaculture |
Volume | 24 |
Publication status | First published - 2012 |
Bibliographical note
1023114Keywords
- Indirect costs
- Infectious haemorrhagic necrosis (IHN)
- Infectious salmon anaemia (ISA)
- Surveillance and control
- Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS)