Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle - a meta analysis

MEA Canozzi, A Mederos, SP Turner, X Manteca, C McManus, SRO Menegassi, JOJ Barcellos*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Dehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting seven studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), average daily gain (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)801-814
JournalAnimal Production Science
Volume59
Issue number5
Early online date30 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 30 May 2018

Fingerprint

Hydrocortisone
Meta-Analysis
Amputation
Pain
Local Anesthesia
Agriculture
Publications
Decision Making
Research Personnel
Databases
Control Groups

Bibliographical note

1032231

Keywords

  • Animal analgesics
  • Animal pain
  • Animal welfare
  • Cattle

Cite this

Canozzi, MEA., Mederos, A., Turner, SP., Manteca, X., McManus, C., Menegassi, SRO., & Barcellos, JOJ. (2018). Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle - a meta analysis. Animal Production Science, 59(5), 801-814. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752
Canozzi, MEA ; Mederos, A ; Turner, SP ; Manteca, X ; McManus, C ; Menegassi, SRO ; Barcellos, JOJ. / Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle - a meta analysis. In: Animal Production Science. 2018 ; Vol. 59, No. 5. pp. 801-814.
@article{41a3ad29ef2a4fe0b0106dfa57fa4079,
title = "Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle - a meta analysis",
abstract = "Dehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting seven studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5{\%}), average daily gain (I2 = 70.5{\%}), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9{\%}). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions.",
keywords = "Animal analgesics, Animal pain, Animal welfare, Cattle",
author = "MEA Canozzi and A Mederos and SP Turner and X Manteca and C McManus and SRO Menegassi and JOJ Barcellos",
note = "1032231",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1071/AN17752",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "801--814",
journal = "Animal Production Science",
issn = "1836-0939",
publisher = "CSIRO",
number = "5",

}

Canozzi, MEA, Mederos, A, Turner, SP, Manteca, X, McManus, C, Menegassi, SRO & Barcellos, JOJ 2018, 'Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle - a meta analysis', Animal Production Science, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 801-814. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752

Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle - a meta analysis. / Canozzi, MEA; Mederos, A; Turner, SP; Manteca, X; McManus, C; Menegassi, SRO; Barcellos, JOJ.

In: Animal Production Science, Vol. 59, No. 5, 30.05.2018, p. 801-814.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle - a meta analysis

AU - Canozzi, MEA

AU - Mederos, A

AU - Turner, SP

AU - Manteca, X

AU - McManus, C

AU - Menegassi, SRO

AU - Barcellos, JOJ

N1 - 1032231

PY - 2018/5/30

Y1 - 2018/5/30

N2 - Dehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting seven studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), average daily gain (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions.

AB - Dehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting seven studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), average daily gain (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions.

KW - Animal analgesics

KW - Animal pain

KW - Animal welfare

KW - Cattle

UR - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752

U2 - 10.1071/AN17752

DO - 10.1071/AN17752

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 801

EP - 814

JO - Animal Production Science

JF - Animal Production Science

SN - 1836-0939

IS - 5

ER -

Canozzi MEA, Mederos A, Turner SP, Manteca X, McManus C, Menegassi SRO et al. Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle - a meta analysis. Animal Production Science. 2018 May 30;59(5):801-814. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752