Abstract
Population reduction is often used as a control strategy when managing infectious diseases in wildlife populations in order
to reduce host density below a critical threshold. However, population reduction can disrupt existing social and
demographic structures leading to changes in observed host behaviour that may result in enhanced disease transmission.
Such effects have been observed in several disease systems, notably badgers and bovine tuberculosis. Here we characterise
the fundamental properties of disease systems for which such effects undermine the disease control benefits of population
reduction. By quantifying the size of response to population reduction in terms of enhanced transmission within a generic
non-spatial model, the properties of disease systems in which such effects reduce or even reverse the disease control
benefits of population reduction are identified. If population reduction is not sufficiently severe, then enhanced
transmission can lead to the counter intuitive perturbation effect, whereby disease levels increase or persist where they
would otherwise die out. Perturbation effects are largest for systems with low levels of disease, e.g. low levels of endemicity
or emerging disease. Analysis of a stochastic spatial meta-population model of demography and disease dynamics leads
to qualitatively similar conclusions. Moreover, enhanced transmission itself is found to arise as an emergent property of
density dependent dispersal in such systems. This spatial analysis also shows that, below some threshold, population
reduction can rapidly increase the area affected by disease, potentially expanding risks to sympatric species. Our results
suggest that the impact of population reduction on social and demographic structures is likely to undermine disease
control in many systems, and in severe cases leads to the perturbation effect. Social and demographic mechanisms that
enhance transmission following population reduction should therefore be routinely considered when designing control
programmes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e86563 |
Journal | PLoS ONE |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | First published - 2 May 2014 |
Bibliographical note
1023268Keywords
- Badgers
- Death rates
- Demography
- Disease dynamics
- Infectious disease control
- Population density
- Veterinary diseases
- Wildlife