Abstract
Research into business associations indicates that many associations suffer from
very high levels of inactive members and fail to deliver significant benefits to members. In
order to improve provision, the objective of this paper is to understand the determinants
that drive or limit performance of rural business associations. Previous research has
focused on the ratio of perceived costs to benefits as informing the decision to remain a
member. However, in small associations, membership may be more influenced by social
norms than the logic of rational choice. Using measures of satisfaction and willingness
to pay for association survival as in-group measures of performance this paper finds
that (1) for small associations, group size is critical, (2) associations are valued higher in
communities where trust is lower, (3) funding by public bodies may be counterproductive
to long-term development aims, and (4) the degree of rurality is insignificant in explaining
association performance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 967 - 985 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Environment and Planning A |
Volume | 45 |
Early online date | 1 Jan 2013 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Print publication - 1 Apr 2013 |
Keywords
- Business associations
- Business networks
- Organisational performance