Diagnostic accuracy of a Brix refractometer to estimate porcine colostrum quality

Áine C. O'Brien, Marianne Farish, Emma M. Baxter, Katharine S. Denholm*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate the validity of the Brix refractometer to accurately estimate immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations in porcine colostrum, using radial immunodiffusion (RID) as a reference standard.MethodsEighty‐seven composite colostrum samples were collected from sows on a single pig farm between September 2022 and September 2024. Brix measurements were compared with IgG RID test results for each colostrum sample.ResultsBrix measurements ranged from 10.80% to 28.05% (mean = 20.13; standard deviation = 3.78). Samples from 40 of the 87 sows (45.98%) were below the colostrum quality threshold of 50 g/L IgG. Pearson's correlation coefficient revealed a strong correlation of 0.81 (p < 0.001) between Brix (%) and RID IgG concentration. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the optimal threshold to accurately determine poor colostrum quality (<50 g/L IgG) using the Brix refractometer. At an RID IgG concentration threshold of less than 50 g/L, ROC analysis (Youden index) defined an optimal Brix threshold of 20.05% (sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.75 and area under the curve = 0.76).LimitationsThe retrospective design of this study led to some inherent limitations with the quality and quantity of the data collected.ConclusionsThe results of this study indicate that the Brix refractometer can be used as an accurate pen‐side tool for estimating IgG concentrations in porcine colostrum.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere5666
JournalVeterinary Record
Early online date21 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 21 Aug 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic accuracy of a Brix refractometer to estimate porcine colostrum quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this