Differential effects of lesion mimic mutants in barley on disease development by facultative pathogens

GRD McGrann, A Steed, C Burt, P Nicholson, JKM Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)
36 Downloads (Pure)


Lesion mimic mutants display spontaneous necrotic spots and chlorotic leaves as a result of mis-regulated cell death programs. Typically these mutants have increased resistance to biotrophic pathogens but their response to facultative fungi that cause necrotrophic diseases is less well studied. The effect of altered cell death regulation on the development of disease caused by Ramularia collo-cygni, Fusarium culmorum and Oculimacula yallundae was explored using a collection of barley necrotic (nec) lesion mimic mutants. nec8 mutants displayed lower levels of all three diseases compared to nec9 mutants, which had increased R. collo-cygni but decreased F. culmorum disease symptoms. nec1 mutants reduced disease development caused by both R. collo-cygni and F. culmorum. The severity of the nec1-induced lesion mimic phenotype and F. culmorum symptom development was reduced by mutation of the negative cell death regulator MLO. The significant reduction in R. collo-cygni symptoms caused by nec1 was completely abolished in the presence of the mlo-5 allele and both symptoms and fungal biomass were greater than in the wild-type. These results indicate that physiological pathways involved in regulation of cell death interact with one another in their effects on different fungal pathogens.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3417 - 3428
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Botany
Issue number11
Publication statusPrint publication - 2015


  • Cell death
  • Disease resistance
  • Endophyte
  • Hemibiotroph
  • Hypersensitive response
  • Necrotroph
  • Plant-microbe interactions
  • mlo


Dive into the research topics of 'Differential effects of lesion mimic mutants in barley on disease development by facultative pathogens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this