Divergent geographies of policy and practice? Voluntarism and devolution in England, Scotland and Wales

M Woolvin, S Mills, I Hardill, A Rutherford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Across Great Britain, engagement with civil society is an increasingly central component of public policy and governance rhetoric. However, attention has tended to focus on policy developments emanating from Westminster that relate to England, rather than the policy and governance ‘spaces’ emerging in the devolved administrations, such as Scotland and Wales. It has also tended to focus on the organisations through which voluntary participation takes place, rather than on voluntary participation itself. In this paper we examine the extent to which there are divergent governance spaces with regards to voluntarism apparent at the national levels of England, Wales and Scotland, set against a backdrop of wider debates on devolution, civil society, community, and the Big Society. Given the common driver of public service reform which emerges from our review, we then examine the emergence of sub-national ‘spaces’ through the example of rural Scotland, in which the delivery of public services can be particularly challenging. Overall, we contend that public policy towards volunteering and the voluntary and community sector (VCS) in Scotland, Wales and England has been shaped by similar drivers, but the rhetoric surrounding their deployment and the distinct governance landscapes in Wales and Scotland have the capacity to influence the deployment of these goals in distinct ways.We also argue that greater attention may need to be paid to emergent ‘sub-national’ governances spaces of voluntarism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38 - 46
Number of pages9
JournalThe Geographical Journal
Volume181
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 27 Jan 2013

Fingerprint

voluntarism
decentralization
geography
governance
public service
civil society
rhetoric
driver
community
reform
participation

Keywords

  • Civil society
  • Devolution
  • England
  • Rural Scotland
  • Voluntarism
  • Wales

Cite this

Woolvin, M ; Mills, S ; Hardill, I ; Rutherford, A. / Divergent geographies of policy and practice? Voluntarism and devolution in England, Scotland and Wales. In: The Geographical Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 181, No. 1. pp. 38 - 46.
@article{100e176789b443d694d13eb96a050039,
title = "Divergent geographies of policy and practice? Voluntarism and devolution in England, Scotland and Wales",
abstract = "Across Great Britain, engagement with civil society is an increasingly central component of public policy and governance rhetoric. However, attention has tended to focus on policy developments emanating from Westminster that relate to England, rather than the policy and governance ‘spaces’ emerging in the devolved administrations, such as Scotland and Wales. It has also tended to focus on the organisations through which voluntary participation takes place, rather than on voluntary participation itself. In this paper we examine the extent to which there are divergent governance spaces with regards to voluntarism apparent at the national levels of England, Wales and Scotland, set against a backdrop of wider debates on devolution, civil society, community, and the Big Society. Given the common driver of public service reform which emerges from our review, we then examine the emergence of sub-national ‘spaces’ through the example of rural Scotland, in which the delivery of public services can be particularly challenging. Overall, we contend that public policy towards volunteering and the voluntary and community sector (VCS) in Scotland, Wales and England has been shaped by similar drivers, but the rhetoric surrounding their deployment and the distinct governance landscapes in Wales and Scotland have the capacity to influence the deployment of these goals in distinct ways.We also argue that greater attention may need to be paid to emergent ‘sub-national’ governances spaces of voluntarism.",
keywords = "Civil society, Devolution, England, Rural Scotland, Voluntarism, Wales",
author = "M Woolvin and S Mills and I Hardill and A Rutherford",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1111/geoj.12069",
language = "English",
volume = "181",
pages = "38 -- 46",
journal = "Geographical Journal",
issn = "0016-7398",
publisher = "Wiley Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Divergent geographies of policy and practice? Voluntarism and devolution in England, Scotland and Wales. / Woolvin, M; Mills, S; Hardill, I; Rutherford, A.

In: The Geographical Journal, Vol. 181, No. 1, 27.01.2013, p. 38 - 46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Divergent geographies of policy and practice? Voluntarism and devolution in England, Scotland and Wales

AU - Woolvin, M

AU - Mills, S

AU - Hardill, I

AU - Rutherford, A

PY - 2013/1/27

Y1 - 2013/1/27

N2 - Across Great Britain, engagement with civil society is an increasingly central component of public policy and governance rhetoric. However, attention has tended to focus on policy developments emanating from Westminster that relate to England, rather than the policy and governance ‘spaces’ emerging in the devolved administrations, such as Scotland and Wales. It has also tended to focus on the organisations through which voluntary participation takes place, rather than on voluntary participation itself. In this paper we examine the extent to which there are divergent governance spaces with regards to voluntarism apparent at the national levels of England, Wales and Scotland, set against a backdrop of wider debates on devolution, civil society, community, and the Big Society. Given the common driver of public service reform which emerges from our review, we then examine the emergence of sub-national ‘spaces’ through the example of rural Scotland, in which the delivery of public services can be particularly challenging. Overall, we contend that public policy towards volunteering and the voluntary and community sector (VCS) in Scotland, Wales and England has been shaped by similar drivers, but the rhetoric surrounding their deployment and the distinct governance landscapes in Wales and Scotland have the capacity to influence the deployment of these goals in distinct ways.We also argue that greater attention may need to be paid to emergent ‘sub-national’ governances spaces of voluntarism.

AB - Across Great Britain, engagement with civil society is an increasingly central component of public policy and governance rhetoric. However, attention has tended to focus on policy developments emanating from Westminster that relate to England, rather than the policy and governance ‘spaces’ emerging in the devolved administrations, such as Scotland and Wales. It has also tended to focus on the organisations through which voluntary participation takes place, rather than on voluntary participation itself. In this paper we examine the extent to which there are divergent governance spaces with regards to voluntarism apparent at the national levels of England, Wales and Scotland, set against a backdrop of wider debates on devolution, civil society, community, and the Big Society. Given the common driver of public service reform which emerges from our review, we then examine the emergence of sub-national ‘spaces’ through the example of rural Scotland, in which the delivery of public services can be particularly challenging. Overall, we contend that public policy towards volunteering and the voluntary and community sector (VCS) in Scotland, Wales and England has been shaped by similar drivers, but the rhetoric surrounding their deployment and the distinct governance landscapes in Wales and Scotland have the capacity to influence the deployment of these goals in distinct ways.We also argue that greater attention may need to be paid to emergent ‘sub-national’ governances spaces of voluntarism.

KW - Civil society

KW - Devolution

KW - England

KW - Rural Scotland

KW - Voluntarism

KW - Wales

U2 - 10.1111/geoj.12069

DO - 10.1111/geoj.12069

M3 - Article

VL - 181

SP - 38

EP - 46

JO - Geographical Journal

JF - Geographical Journal

SN - 0016-7398

IS - 1

ER -