Do community empowerment and enabling state policies work in practice? Insights from a community development intervention in rural Scotland

M Markantoni, A Steiner, JE Meador, J Farmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the transition from welfare to ‘enabling’ states, governments move away from their previous roles as providers of services. Individuals and communities as collectives of individuals are encouraged to play a more active role in improving their own wellbeing and resilience, thus shifting from dependence on the state to self-reliance. This proposed transformation is highly complex and poorly understood. We question whether government interventions and policies aimed at strengthening community empowerment can lead to an enabling state. By examining externally funded community projects in six rural Scottish villages, we investigate whether these development initiatives helped to improve socio-economic aspects related to community resilience. We used uni/bivariate and multivariate analysis with data from 345 structured interviews. Our results show that those communities where projects were completed had a higher average social resilience than the communities where projects remained incomplete. Social resilience factors, including social ties and networks, were predictors of completing community projects. Our results indicate that some communities are harder to activate and require external state support which addresses local needs so that these communities play a more active civic role. If states seek ‘resilient communities’, interventions must be co-designed with citizens to create conditions that will engage and enable people to take more control of aspects of their future, including those communities with a history of minimal civic participation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142 - 154
Number of pages13
JournalGeoforum
Volume97
Early online date6 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 6 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

community development
empowerment
community
resilience
enabling state
multivariate analysis
social factors
village
welfare
citizen
participation

Keywords

  • Community development
  • Community resilience
  • Enabling state
  • LEADER programme
  • Neoliberalism
  • Rural communities

Cite this

@article{4b7630e319d44f80aa975a296d5d228b,
title = "Do community empowerment and enabling state policies work in practice? Insights from a community development intervention in rural Scotland",
abstract = "In the transition from welfare to ‘enabling’ states, governments move away from their previous roles as providers of services. Individuals and communities as collectives of individuals are encouraged to play a more active role in improving their own wellbeing and resilience, thus shifting from dependence on the state to self-reliance. This proposed transformation is highly complex and poorly understood. We question whether government interventions and policies aimed at strengthening community empowerment can lead to an enabling state. By examining externally funded community projects in six rural Scottish villages, we investigate whether these development initiatives helped to improve socio-economic aspects related to community resilience. We used uni/bivariate and multivariate analysis with data from 345 structured interviews. Our results show that those communities where projects were completed had a higher average social resilience than the communities where projects remained incomplete. Social resilience factors, including social ties and networks, were predictors of completing community projects. Our results indicate that some communities are harder to activate and require external state support which addresses local needs so that these communities play a more active civic role. If states seek ‘resilient communities’, interventions must be co-designed with citizens to create conditions that will engage and enable people to take more control of aspects of their future, including those communities with a history of minimal civic participation.",
keywords = "Community development, Community resilience, Enabling state, LEADER programme, Neoliberalism, Rural communities",
author = "M Markantoni and A Steiner and JE Meador and J Farmer",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.022",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "142 -- 154",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Do community empowerment and enabling state policies work in practice? Insights from a community development intervention in rural Scotland. / Markantoni, M; Steiner, A; Meador, JE; Farmer, J.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 97, 06.11.2018, p. 142 - 154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do community empowerment and enabling state policies work in practice? Insights from a community development intervention in rural Scotland

AU - Markantoni, M

AU - Steiner, A

AU - Meador, JE

AU - Farmer, J

PY - 2018/11/6

Y1 - 2018/11/6

N2 - In the transition from welfare to ‘enabling’ states, governments move away from their previous roles as providers of services. Individuals and communities as collectives of individuals are encouraged to play a more active role in improving their own wellbeing and resilience, thus shifting from dependence on the state to self-reliance. This proposed transformation is highly complex and poorly understood. We question whether government interventions and policies aimed at strengthening community empowerment can lead to an enabling state. By examining externally funded community projects in six rural Scottish villages, we investigate whether these development initiatives helped to improve socio-economic aspects related to community resilience. We used uni/bivariate and multivariate analysis with data from 345 structured interviews. Our results show that those communities where projects were completed had a higher average social resilience than the communities where projects remained incomplete. Social resilience factors, including social ties and networks, were predictors of completing community projects. Our results indicate that some communities are harder to activate and require external state support which addresses local needs so that these communities play a more active civic role. If states seek ‘resilient communities’, interventions must be co-designed with citizens to create conditions that will engage and enable people to take more control of aspects of their future, including those communities with a history of minimal civic participation.

AB - In the transition from welfare to ‘enabling’ states, governments move away from their previous roles as providers of services. Individuals and communities as collectives of individuals are encouraged to play a more active role in improving their own wellbeing and resilience, thus shifting from dependence on the state to self-reliance. This proposed transformation is highly complex and poorly understood. We question whether government interventions and policies aimed at strengthening community empowerment can lead to an enabling state. By examining externally funded community projects in six rural Scottish villages, we investigate whether these development initiatives helped to improve socio-economic aspects related to community resilience. We used uni/bivariate and multivariate analysis with data from 345 structured interviews. Our results show that those communities where projects were completed had a higher average social resilience than the communities where projects remained incomplete. Social resilience factors, including social ties and networks, were predictors of completing community projects. Our results indicate that some communities are harder to activate and require external state support which addresses local needs so that these communities play a more active civic role. If states seek ‘resilient communities’, interventions must be co-designed with citizens to create conditions that will engage and enable people to take more control of aspects of their future, including those communities with a history of minimal civic participation.

KW - Community development

KW - Community resilience

KW - Enabling state

KW - LEADER programme

KW - Neoliberalism

KW - Rural communities

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.022

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.022

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 142

EP - 154

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -