Ecosystem-based solutions for disaster risk reduction: lessons from European applications of ecosystem-based adaptation measures

A McVittie, LJ Cole, A Wreford, A Sgobbi, B Yordi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)
159 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation are connected through a common goal: reducing the impacts of extreme events and increasing resilience to disasters, particularly among vulnerable populations. By coordinating adaptation and disaster risk management policies, multiple benefits can be achieved. Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) offers a cost-effective adaptation and DRR at different scales and under multiple scenarios. EbA uses natural or managed ecosystem processes to increase resilience and adaptation to climate change. EbA delivers other benefits, including mitigating greenhouse gases, and improving biodiversity, water and air quality. These co-benefits can be the primary driver for implementation and reflect related policy objectives. EbA are also associated with different land use or habitat types (e.g. agriculture, forestry, coastal, urban, or freshwater ecosystems). This paper considers the lessons learnt from implementing EbA across a range of land uses. However, implementation frequently applies multiple measures across land uses and at varying scales. The evidence indicates that adaptation and DRR are achievable cost-effectively whilst providing important co-benefits. Demonstrating these co-benefits ensures both stakeholder support and funding opportunities. Further, the mainstreaming of nature-based solutions across policy areas linked to different co-benefits both increases the acceptability of EbA and also opens up multiple funding sources. Key to the success of EbA is the involvement of stakeholders throughout the implementation process; this can include demonstrating private benefits and utilising trusted intermediaries. However, gaps often remain in our knowledge of the biophysical and economic benefits, or negative impacts, of EbA indicating that research and monitoring remain a priority.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42 - 54
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Volume32
Early online date27 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 27 Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

20107822

Keywords

  • Climate adaptation
  • Disaster risk management
  • Ecosystem services
  • Ecosystem-based approaches

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ecosystem-based solutions for disaster risk reduction: lessons from European applications of ecosystem-based adaptation measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Profiles

    No photo of Lorna Cole

    Lorna Cole

    Person: Academic contract that is research only

    No photo of Alistair McVittie

    Alistair McVittie

    Person: Academic contract that is both teaching and research

    Cite this