TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of soil physical quality index S for some tropical and temperate medium-textured soils
AU - Moncada, MP
AU - Ball, BC
AU - Gabriels, D
AU - Lobo, D
AU - Cornelis, WM
N1 - 1023324
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The soil physical quality (SPQ) index S can provide inconsistent designations
of SPQ and has a lack of consistency with other physical indicators for some
soils. The aim of this study was to compare the suitability of S in identifying
SPQ against 12 SPQ indicators, including water-release-related indicators,
physical properties, and visual examinations. This study was conducted
on medium-textured soil samples taken from tropical and temperate soils.
Comparisons of SPQ class and relationships between indicators were used to
judge the S SPQ designation. For the studied soils, S classified SPQ in the
same way as other indicators when the condition of the soil was optimal or
degraded but not when it was intermediate. This demonstrates that the proposed
critical limits for S are not generally valid and do not apply for all soil
conditions. Porosity parameters from the water release curve were more consistent
indicators of SPQ than S. Our work also demonstrates that scores from
visual examinations have at least similar resolution (P > 0.05) to the other
indicators of SPQ evaluated. The use of S as an indicator to be considered
as part of a minimum data set of indicators of SPQ assessment is less viable
when other indicators such as bulk density, porosity, and visual examination
are much more easily determined and more consistent than S. Therefore, it is
too ambitious to consider that a unique indicator such as the S index could
be used to evaluate SPQ as such.
AB - The soil physical quality (SPQ) index S can provide inconsistent designations
of SPQ and has a lack of consistency with other physical indicators for some
soils. The aim of this study was to compare the suitability of S in identifying
SPQ against 12 SPQ indicators, including water-release-related indicators,
physical properties, and visual examinations. This study was conducted
on medium-textured soil samples taken from tropical and temperate soils.
Comparisons of SPQ class and relationships between indicators were used to
judge the S SPQ designation. For the studied soils, S classified SPQ in the
same way as other indicators when the condition of the soil was optimal or
degraded but not when it was intermediate. This demonstrates that the proposed
critical limits for S are not generally valid and do not apply for all soil
conditions. Porosity parameters from the water release curve were more consistent
indicators of SPQ than S. Our work also demonstrates that scores from
visual examinations have at least similar resolution (P > 0.05) to the other
indicators of SPQ evaluated. The use of S as an indicator to be considered
as part of a minimum data set of indicators of SPQ assessment is less viable
when other indicators such as bulk density, porosity, and visual examination
are much more easily determined and more consistent than S. Therefore, it is
too ambitious to consider that a unique indicator such as the S index could
be used to evaluate SPQ as such.
U2 - 10.2136/sssaj2014.06.0259
DO - 10.2136/sssaj2014.06.0259
M3 - Article
VL - 79
SP - 9
EP - 19
JO - Soil Science Society of America Journal
JF - Soil Science Society of America Journal
IS - 1
ER -