Abstract
The soil physical quality (SPQ) index S can provide inconsistent designations
of SPQ and has a lack of consistency with other physical indicators for some
soils. The aim of this study was to compare the suitability of S in identifying
SPQ against 12 SPQ indicators, including water-release-related indicators,
physical properties, and visual examinations. This study was conducted
on medium-textured soil samples taken from tropical and temperate soils.
Comparisons of SPQ class and relationships between indicators were used to
judge the S SPQ designation. For the studied soils, S classified SPQ in the
same way as other indicators when the condition of the soil was optimal or
degraded but not when it was intermediate. This demonstrates that the proposed
critical limits for S are not generally valid and do not apply for all soil
conditions. Porosity parameters from the water release curve were more consistent
indicators of SPQ than S. Our work also demonstrates that scores from
visual examinations have at least similar resolution (P > 0.05) to the other
indicators of SPQ evaluated. The use of S as an indicator to be considered
as part of a minimum data set of indicators of SPQ assessment is less viable
when other indicators such as bulk density, porosity, and visual examination
are much more easily determined and more consistent than S. Therefore, it is
too ambitious to consider that a unique indicator such as the S index could
be used to evaluate SPQ as such.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 9 - 19 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Soil Science Society of America Journal |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Print publication - 2015 |
Bibliographical note
1023324Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of soil physical quality index S for some tropical and temperate medium-textured soils'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver