Abstract
Issues regarding the loss of effective molluscicides (e.g. methiocarb), and threat of
revocation due to metaldehyde contamination of drinking water catchments, suggest that information on the comparative efficacy of other available options such as ferric phosphate, the biopesticide NemaSlug, timing of applications and the persistence of slug pellets are required.
revocation due to metaldehyde contamination of drinking water catchments, suggest that information on the comparative efficacy of other available options such as ferric phosphate, the biopesticide NemaSlug, timing of applications and the persistence of slug pellets are required.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Agricultural And Horticultural Development Board (AHDB) |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Edition | 11120025 |
| Publication status | Print publication - 2017 |