Existence and quality of data on control programs for EU non-regulated cattle diseases: consequences for estimation and comparison of the probability of disease freedom

Eglė Rapaliute*, Annika M van Roon, Gerdien van Schaik, I. M.G.A. Santman-Berends, Xhelil Koleci, Madalina Mincu, Jörn Gethmann, Beate Conrady, Tanja Knific, Jaka Jakob Hodnik, John Berezowski, Luís Pedro Carmo, Aurélien Madouasse, Attila Tarpai, Anton Gerilovych, Alvydas Malakauskas, Blagica Sekovska, Christine Fourichon, Emmanouil Kalaitzakis, Franz Ferdinand RochHans Houe, Katarzyna Dudek, Kerli Mõtus, László Ózsvári, Lina Costa, Maria Guelbenzu Gonzalo, MK Henry, Mentor Alishani, Nicola Pozzato, Petter Hopp, Ramon Juste, Sam Strain, René Mandelík, Stefan Vilcek, Tiina Autio, Lena-Mari Tamminen, Céline Faverjon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)


Some European countries have successfully implemented country-specific control programs (CPs) for infectious cattle diseases that are not regulated or are regulated only to a limited extent at the European Union (EU) level. Examples of such diseases include bovine viral diarrhea (BVD), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), and Johne's disease (JD). The CPs vary between countries in the design and quality of collected data as well as methods used to detect infection and estimate prevalence or probability of freedom from infection. Differences in disease status between countries and non-standardized approaches to assess freedom from infection pose a risk for countries with CPs for non-regulated diseases as infected animals may influence the progress of the disease control or eradication program. The implementation of output-based standards allows estimation and comparison of the probability of freedom for non-regulated cattle diseases in European countries. The aim of the current study was to assess the existence and quality of data that could be used for estimating freedom from infection in European countries. The online data collection tool was sent to 32 countries participating in the SOUND control COST Action and was completed by 24 countries. Data on cattle demographics and data from CPs of IBR and BVD exist in more than 50% of the response countries. However, data describing risk factors and CP of JD was reported as existing in <25% of the countries. The overall quality of data in the sections on demographics and CPs of IBR and BVD were evaluated as “good”, but risk factors and JD data were mostly evaluated as “fair.” Data quality was considered less good mainly due to two quality criteria: accessibility and accuracy. The results of this study show that the quantity and quality of data about cattle populations and CPs are relatively similar in many surveyed countries. The outcome of this work provides an overview of the current situation in the European countries regarding data on EU non-regulated cattle diseases and will further assist in the development and implementation of output-based standards.

Original languageEnglish
Article number689375
JournalFrontiers in Veterinary Science
Early online date19 Jul 2021
Publication statusFirst published - 19 Jul 2021


  • animal health data
  • cattle
  • control programs
  • non-regulated diseases
  • output-based
  • proof of freedom


Dive into the research topics of 'Existence and quality of data on control programs for EU non-regulated cattle diseases: consequences for estimation and comparison of the probability of disease freedom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this