Exploring the landscape of livestock ‘Facts’

G. R. Salmon*, M. MacLeod, J. R. Claxton, U. Pica Ciamarra, T. Robinson, A. Duncan, A. R. Peters

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The role of livestock in supporting human well-being is contentious, with different perceptions leading to polarised opinions. There is increasing concern about the health and environmental impacts of a high rate of consumption of livestock products in high-income countries. These concerns are heightened by an increase in consumption in middle-income countries. On the other hand, livestock support the livelihoods of many people, particularly in low income countries. The benefits of livestock for poor livestock keepers are multiple, including the important role livestock play in supporting crop production in mixed systems, in supplying nutrients and income, and in fulfilling cultural roles. In addition livestock can provide resilience against economic and climate shocks. In view of these apparent positive and negative impacts, the role of livestock in human wellbeing is highly contested, with arguments ‘for’ or ‘against’ sometimes distorted by vested interests or misinterpretation of evidence. The Livestock Fact Check project, undertaken by the Livestock Data for Decisions community of practice, has investigated several ideas concerning livestock commonly taken as ‘fact’. By exploring the provenance of these ‘facts’ we highlight their importance and the risks of both misinterpreting them or using them out of context. Despite the diversity of the livestock sector resulting in equally diverse viewpoints, the project calls for participants in the livestock discourse to adopt a nuanced appreciation of global livestock systems. Judgement of livestock's role in global sustainable diets should be based on clear and well-interpreted information.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100329
JournalGlobal Food Security
Early online date31 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 31 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Livestock
Farms
livestock
income
role play
resilience
livelihood
environmental impact
low income
well-being
climate
discourse
health
community
evidence
economics
health impact
Nutrition
Climate
crop production

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Evidence
  • Facts
  • Livestock

Cite this

Salmon, G. R., MacLeod, M., Claxton, J. R., Pica Ciamarra, U., Robinson, T., Duncan, A., & Peters, A. R. (2019). Exploring the landscape of livestock ‘Facts’. Global Food Security, [100329]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100329
Salmon, G. R. ; MacLeod, M. ; Claxton, J. R. ; Pica Ciamarra, U. ; Robinson, T. ; Duncan, A. ; Peters, A. R. / Exploring the landscape of livestock ‘Facts’. In: Global Food Security. 2019.
@article{ab7505e8eff74769b3a68f0dbd9f9054,
title = "Exploring the landscape of livestock ‘Facts’",
abstract = "The role of livestock in supporting human well-being is contentious, with different perceptions leading to polarised opinions. There is increasing concern about the health and environmental impacts of a high rate of consumption of livestock products in high-income countries. These concerns are heightened by an increase in consumption in middle-income countries. On the other hand, livestock support the livelihoods of many people, particularly in low income countries. The benefits of livestock for poor livestock keepers are multiple, including the important role livestock play in supporting crop production in mixed systems, in supplying nutrients and income, and in fulfilling cultural roles. In addition livestock can provide resilience against economic and climate shocks. In view of these apparent positive and negative impacts, the role of livestock in human wellbeing is highly contested, with arguments ‘for’ or ‘against’ sometimes distorted by vested interests or misinterpretation of evidence. The Livestock Fact Check project, undertaken by the Livestock Data for Decisions community of practice, has investigated several ideas concerning livestock commonly taken as ‘fact’. By exploring the provenance of these ‘facts’ we highlight their importance and the risks of both misinterpreting them or using them out of context. Despite the diversity of the livestock sector resulting in equally diverse viewpoints, the project calls for participants in the livestock discourse to adopt a nuanced appreciation of global livestock systems. Judgement of livestock's role in global sustainable diets should be based on clear and well-interpreted information.",
keywords = "Communication, Evidence, Facts, Livestock",
author = "Salmon, {G. R.} and M. MacLeod and Claxton, {J. R.} and {Pica Ciamarra}, U. and T. Robinson and A. Duncan and Peters, {A. R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100329",
language = "English",
journal = "Global Food Security",
issn = "2211-9124",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Salmon, GR, MacLeod, M, Claxton, JR, Pica Ciamarra, U, Robinson, T, Duncan, A & Peters, AR 2019, 'Exploring the landscape of livestock ‘Facts’', Global Food Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100329

Exploring the landscape of livestock ‘Facts’. / Salmon, G. R.; MacLeod, M.; Claxton, J. R.; Pica Ciamarra, U.; Robinson, T.; Duncan, A.; Peters, A. R.

In: Global Food Security, 31.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the landscape of livestock ‘Facts’

AU - Salmon, G. R.

AU - MacLeod, M.

AU - Claxton, J. R.

AU - Pica Ciamarra, U.

AU - Robinson, T.

AU - Duncan, A.

AU - Peters, A. R.

PY - 2019/10/31

Y1 - 2019/10/31

N2 - The role of livestock in supporting human well-being is contentious, with different perceptions leading to polarised opinions. There is increasing concern about the health and environmental impacts of a high rate of consumption of livestock products in high-income countries. These concerns are heightened by an increase in consumption in middle-income countries. On the other hand, livestock support the livelihoods of many people, particularly in low income countries. The benefits of livestock for poor livestock keepers are multiple, including the important role livestock play in supporting crop production in mixed systems, in supplying nutrients and income, and in fulfilling cultural roles. In addition livestock can provide resilience against economic and climate shocks. In view of these apparent positive and negative impacts, the role of livestock in human wellbeing is highly contested, with arguments ‘for’ or ‘against’ sometimes distorted by vested interests or misinterpretation of evidence. The Livestock Fact Check project, undertaken by the Livestock Data for Decisions community of practice, has investigated several ideas concerning livestock commonly taken as ‘fact’. By exploring the provenance of these ‘facts’ we highlight their importance and the risks of both misinterpreting them or using them out of context. Despite the diversity of the livestock sector resulting in equally diverse viewpoints, the project calls for participants in the livestock discourse to adopt a nuanced appreciation of global livestock systems. Judgement of livestock's role in global sustainable diets should be based on clear and well-interpreted information.

AB - The role of livestock in supporting human well-being is contentious, with different perceptions leading to polarised opinions. There is increasing concern about the health and environmental impacts of a high rate of consumption of livestock products in high-income countries. These concerns are heightened by an increase in consumption in middle-income countries. On the other hand, livestock support the livelihoods of many people, particularly in low income countries. The benefits of livestock for poor livestock keepers are multiple, including the important role livestock play in supporting crop production in mixed systems, in supplying nutrients and income, and in fulfilling cultural roles. In addition livestock can provide resilience against economic and climate shocks. In view of these apparent positive and negative impacts, the role of livestock in human wellbeing is highly contested, with arguments ‘for’ or ‘against’ sometimes distorted by vested interests or misinterpretation of evidence. The Livestock Fact Check project, undertaken by the Livestock Data for Decisions community of practice, has investigated several ideas concerning livestock commonly taken as ‘fact’. By exploring the provenance of these ‘facts’ we highlight their importance and the risks of both misinterpreting them or using them out of context. Despite the diversity of the livestock sector resulting in equally diverse viewpoints, the project calls for participants in the livestock discourse to adopt a nuanced appreciation of global livestock systems. Judgement of livestock's role in global sustainable diets should be based on clear and well-interpreted information.

KW - Communication

KW - Evidence

KW - Facts

KW - Livestock

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074342982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100329

DO - 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100329

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85074342982

JO - Global Food Security

JF - Global Food Security

SN - 2211-9124

M1 - 100329

ER -

Salmon GR, MacLeod M, Claxton JR, Pica Ciamarra U, Robinson T, Duncan A et al. Exploring the landscape of livestock ‘Facts’. Global Food Security. 2019 Oct 31. 100329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100329