Abstract
types. The model was run under a baseline scenario where existing farm soil management practices were adopted and under the four alternative management scenarios. The results suggest that the tillage management options are financially more beneficial compared to the cover crop and residue management practices. The cover crops management practice is associated with the lowest N2O emissions. The residue management is projected to have neither financial nor environment benefits on farms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Aspects of Applied Biology |
| Subtitle of host publication | Soil Improvement: Impact of Management Practices on Soil Function and Quality |
| Publisher | Association of Applied Biologists |
| Pages | 83-88 |
| Volume | 140 |
| ISBN (Print) | 0265-1491 |
| Publication status | Print publication - 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Farm level model
- Scottish arable farms
- N2O emissions
- Farm optimisation
- Farm net profit
- ScotFarm
Cite this
}
Financial and N2O effects of soil management measures on arable farms in Scotland. / Shrestha, S; Eory, V; Topp, CFE.
Aspects of Applied Biology: Soil Improvement: Impact of Management Practices on Soil Function and Quality . Vol. 140 Association of Applied Biologists, 2018. p. 83-88.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
TY - GEN
T1 - Financial and N2O effects of soil management measures on arable farms in Scotland
AU - Shrestha, S
AU - Eory, V
AU - Topp, CFE
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - This paper presents financial and environment impacts of four farm management scenarios (cover crops, residue management, zero tillage and minimum tillage) which are applicable to Scottish arable farms. Financial impact was considered to be the changes in farm net profit and environment impact was considered to be the changes in total N2O emission on farm. A farm level optimising model, ScotFarm, was used on four representative arable farmtypes. The model was run under a baseline scenario where existing farm soil management practices were adopted and under the four alternative management scenarios. The results suggest that the tillage management options are financially more beneficial compared to the cover crop and residue management practices. The cover crops management practice is associated with the lowest N2O emissions. The residue management is projected to have neither financial nor environment benefits on farms.
AB - This paper presents financial and environment impacts of four farm management scenarios (cover crops, residue management, zero tillage and minimum tillage) which are applicable to Scottish arable farms. Financial impact was considered to be the changes in farm net profit and environment impact was considered to be the changes in total N2O emission on farm. A farm level optimising model, ScotFarm, was used on four representative arable farmtypes. The model was run under a baseline scenario where existing farm soil management practices were adopted and under the four alternative management scenarios. The results suggest that the tillage management options are financially more beneficial compared to the cover crop and residue management practices. The cover crops management practice is associated with the lowest N2O emissions. The residue management is projected to have neither financial nor environment benefits on farms.
KW - Farm level model
KW - Scottish arable farms
KW - N2O emissions
KW - Farm optimisation
KW - Farm net profit
KW - ScotFarm
UR - https://www.aab.org.uk/aspects-of-applied-biology
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 0265-1491
VL - 140
SP - 83
EP - 88
BT - Aspects of Applied Biology
PB - Association of Applied Biologists
ER -