Food system resilience: concepts, issues and challenges

Monika Zurek; John Ingram; Angelina Sanderson Bellamy; Conor Goold; Christopher Lyon; Peter Alexander; Andrew Barnes; Daniel P. Bebber; Tom D. Breeze; Ann Bruce; Lisa M. Collins; Jessica Davies; Bob Doherty; Jonathan Ensor; Sofia C. Franco; Andrea Gatto; Tim Hess; Chrysa Lamprinopoulou; Lingxuan Liu; Magnus Merkle; Lisa Norton; Tom Oliver; Jeff Ollerton; Simon Potts; Mark S. Reed; Chloe Sutcliffe; Paul J.A. Withers

doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744

Food system resilience: concepts, issues and challenges

Monika Zurek, John Ingram, Angelina Sanderson Bellamy, Conor Goold, Christopher Lyon, Peter Alexander, Andrew Barnes, Daniel P. Bebber, Tom D. Breeze, Ann Bruce, Lisa M. Collins, Jessica Davies, Bob Doherty, Jonathan Ensor, Sofia C. Franco, Andrea Gatto, Tim Hess, Chrysa Lamprinopoulou, Lingxuan Liu, Magnus MerkleLisa Norton, Tom Oliver, Jeff Ollerton, Simon Potts, Mark S. Reed, Chloe Sutcliffe, Paul J.A. Withers

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short communication › peer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Food system resilience has multiple dimensions. We draw on ‘food system’ and ‘resilience’ concepts and review resilience framings of different communities. We present four questions to frame food system resilience (resilience of what? to what? from who’s perspective? and over what time period?), and three approaches to enhancing resilience (‘robustness’, ‘recovery’ and ‘reorientation’; the three ‘Rs’). We focus on enhancing resilience of food system outcomes and argue this will require food system actors adapting their activities, noting that activities do not change spontaneously, but in response to a change in drivers: an opportunity or a threat. However, operationalising resilience enhancement involves normative choices, and will result in decisions having to be negotiated about trade-offs among food system outcomes for different stakeholders. New approaches to including different food system actors’ perceptions and goals are needed to build food systems that are better positioned to address challenges of the future.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	511-534
Number of pages	24
Journal	Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Volume	47
Issue number	1
Early online date	20 Sept 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744
Publication status	Print publication - Oct 2022

Keywords

General Environmental Science
social-ecological systems
robustness
adaptation
recovery
transformation
reorientation

Access to Document

10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744Licence: CC BY

annurev-environ-112320-050744Final published version, 443 KBLicence: CC BY

https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/food-system-resilience-concepts-issues-and-challenges

Cite this

Zurek, M., Ingram, J., Bellamy, A. S., Goold, C., Lyon, C., Alexander, P., Barnes, A., Bebber, D. P., Breeze, T. D., Bruce, A., Collins, L. M., Davies, J., Doherty, B., Ensor, J., Franco, S. C., Gatto, A., Hess, T., Lamprinopoulou, C., Liu, L., ... Withers, P. J. A. (2022). Food system resilience: concepts, issues and challenges. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47(1), 511-534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744

@article{47cad161f9144747bac5390b2d9cd75b,

title = "Food system resilience: concepts, issues and challenges",

abstract = "Food system resilience has multiple dimensions. We draw on {\textquoteleft}food system{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}resilience{\textquoteright} concepts and review resilience framings of different communities. We present four questions to frame food system resilience (resilience of what? to what? from who{\textquoteright}s perspective? and over what time period?), and three approaches to enhancing resilience ({\textquoteleft}robustness{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}recovery{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}reorientation{\textquoteright}; the three {\textquoteleft}Rs{\textquoteright}). We focus on enhancing resilience of food system outcomes and argue this will require food system actors adapting their activities, noting that activities do not change spontaneously, but in response to a change in drivers: an opportunity or a threat. However, operationalising resilience enhancement involves normative choices, and will result in decisions having to be negotiated about trade-offs among food system outcomes for different stakeholders. New approaches to including different food system actors{\textquoteright} perceptions and goals are needed to build food systems that are better positioned to address challenges of the future.",

keywords = "General Environmental Science, social-ecological systems, robustness, adaptation, recovery, transformation, reorientation",

author = "Monika Zurek and John Ingram and Bellamy, {Angelina Sanderson} and Conor Goold and Christopher Lyon and Peter Alexander and Andrew Barnes and Bebber, {Daniel P.} and Breeze, {Tom D.} and Ann Bruce and Collins, {Lisa M.} and Jessica Davies and Bob Doherty and Jonathan Ensor and Franco, {Sofia C.} and Andrea Gatto and Tim Hess and Chrysa Lamprinopoulou and Lingxuan Liu and Magnus Merkle and Lisa Norton and Tom Oliver and Jeff Ollerton and Simon Potts and Reed, {Mark S.} and Chloe Sutcliffe and Withers, {Paul J.A.}",

year = "2022",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744",

language = "English",

volume = "47",

pages = "511--534",

journal = "Annual Review of Environment and Resources",

issn = "1543-5938",

publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

number = "1",

}

Zurek, M, Ingram, J, Bellamy, AS, Goold, C, Lyon, C, Alexander, P, Barnes, A, Bebber, DP, Breeze, TD, Bruce, A, Collins, LM, Davies, J, Doherty, B, Ensor, J, Franco, SC, Gatto, A, Hess, T, Lamprinopoulou, C, Liu, L, Merkle, M, Norton, L, Oliver, T, Ollerton, J, Potts, S, Reed, MS, Sutcliffe, C & Withers, PJA 2022, 'Food system resilience: concepts, issues and challenges', Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 511-534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744

TY - JOUR

T1 - Food system resilience: concepts, issues and challenges

AU - Zurek, Monika

AU - Ingram, John

AU - Bellamy, Angelina Sanderson

AU - Goold, Conor

AU - Lyon, Christopher

AU - Alexander, Peter

AU - Barnes, Andrew

AU - Bebber, Daniel P.

AU - Breeze, Tom D.

AU - Bruce, Ann

AU - Collins, Lisa M.

AU - Davies, Jessica

AU - Doherty, Bob

AU - Ensor, Jonathan

AU - Franco, Sofia C.

AU - Gatto, Andrea

AU - Hess, Tim

AU - Lamprinopoulou, Chrysa

AU - Liu, Lingxuan

AU - Merkle, Magnus

AU - Norton, Lisa

AU - Oliver, Tom

AU - Ollerton, Jeff

AU - Potts, Simon

AU - Reed, Mark S.

AU - Sutcliffe, Chloe

AU - Withers, Paul J.A.

PY - 2022/10

Y1 - 2022/10

N2 - Food system resilience has multiple dimensions. We draw on ‘food system’ and ‘resilience’ concepts and review resilience framings of different communities. We present four questions to frame food system resilience (resilience of what? to what? from who’s perspective? and over what time period?), and three approaches to enhancing resilience (‘robustness’, ‘recovery’ and ‘reorientation’; the three ‘Rs’). We focus on enhancing resilience of food system outcomes and argue this will require food system actors adapting their activities, noting that activities do not change spontaneously, but in response to a change in drivers: an opportunity or a threat. However, operationalising resilience enhancement involves normative choices, and will result in decisions having to be negotiated about trade-offs among food system outcomes for different stakeholders. New approaches to including different food system actors’ perceptions and goals are needed to build food systems that are better positioned to address challenges of the future.

AB - Food system resilience has multiple dimensions. We draw on ‘food system’ and ‘resilience’ concepts and review resilience framings of different communities. We present four questions to frame food system resilience (resilience of what? to what? from who’s perspective? and over what time period?), and three approaches to enhancing resilience (‘robustness’, ‘recovery’ and ‘reorientation’; the three ‘Rs’). We focus on enhancing resilience of food system outcomes and argue this will require food system actors adapting their activities, noting that activities do not change spontaneously, but in response to a change in drivers: an opportunity or a threat. However, operationalising resilience enhancement involves normative choices, and will result in decisions having to be negotiated about trade-offs among food system outcomes for different stakeholders. New approaches to including different food system actors’ perceptions and goals are needed to build food systems that are better positioned to address challenges of the future.

KW - General Environmental Science

KW - social-ecological systems

KW - robustness

KW - adaptation

KW - recovery

KW - transformation

KW - reorientation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132845106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744

DO - 10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744

M3 - Short communication

SN - 1543-5938

VL - 47

SP - 511

EP - 534

JO - Annual Review of Environment and Resources

JF - Annual Review of Environment and Resources

IS - 1

ER -

Food system resilience: concepts, issues and challenges

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

RESAS 22-27: SRUC-c4-1 Building The Circular Economy: Sustainable Technologies, Green Skills And Upscaling Behaviours

EPIC IV: Scottish Government's Centre of Expertise on Animal Disease Outbreaks, 2022 - 2025 (EPIC IV)

RESAS 22-27: SRUC-b3-1 Ensuring Positive Behavioural Change For Farmers Towards Best Practice For Clean Growth: Economic And Behavioural Investigations.

Cite this

Food system resilience: concepts, issues and challenges

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

RESAS 22-27: SRUC-c4-1 Building The Circular Economy: Sustainable Technologies, Green Skills And Upscaling Behaviours

EPIC IV: Scottish Government's Centre of Expertise on Animal Disease Outbreaks, 2022 - 2025 (EPIC IV)

RESAS 22-27: SRUC-b3-1 Ensuring Positive Behavioural Change For Farmers Towards Best Practice For Clean Growth: Economic And Behavioural Investigations.

Cite this