TY - JOUR
T1 - Genomic prediction of dry matter intake in dairy cattle from an international data set consisting of research herds in Europe, North America and Australasia
AU - de Haas, Y
AU - Pryce, JE
AU - Calus, MPL
AU - Wall, E
AU - Berry, DP
AU - Lovendahl, P
AU - Krattenmacher, N
AU - Miglior, F
AU - Weigel, K
AU - Spurlock, D
AU - Macdonald, KA
AU - Hulsegge, B
AU - Veerkamp, RF
N1 - 1023378 © American Dairy Science Association®, 2015.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - With the aim of increasing the accuracy of genomic
estimated breeding values for dry matter intake (DMI)
in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle, data from 10 research
herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia
were combined. The DMI records were available on
10,701 parity 1 to 5 records from 6,953 cows, as well
as on 1,784 growing heifers. Predicted DMI at 70 d
in milk was used as the phenotype for the lactating
animals, and the average DMI measured during a 60- to
70-d test period at approximately 200 d of age was
used as the phenotype for the growing heifers. After
editing, there were 583,375 genetic markers obtained
from either actual high-density single nucleotide polymorphism
(SNP) genotypes or imputed from 54,001
marker SNP genotypes. Genetic correlations between
the populations were estimated using genomic REML.
The accuracy of genomic prediction was evaluated for
the following scenarios: (1) within-country only, by
fixing the correlations among populations to zero, (2)
using near-unity correlations among populations and
assuming the same trait in each population, and (3)
a sharing data scenario using estimated genetic correlations
among populations. For these 3 scenarios, the
data set was divided into 10 sub-populations stratified
by progeny group of sires; 9 of these sub-populations
were used (in turn) for the genomic prediction and the
tenth was used for calculation of the accuracy (correlation
adjusted for heritability). A fourth scenario to
quantify the benefit for countries that do not record
DMI was investigated (i.e., having an entire country as
the validation population and excluding this country
in the development of the genomic predictions). The
optimal scenario, which was sharing data, resulted in
a mean prediction accuracy of 0.44, ranging from 0.37
(Denmark) to 0.54 (the Netherlands). Assuming nearunity
among-country genetic correlations, the mean
accuracy of prediction dropped to 0.40, and the mean
within-country accuracy was 0.30. If no records were
available in a country, the accuracy based on the other
populations ranged from 0.23 to 0.53 for the milking
cows, but were only 0.03 and 0.19 for Australian and
New Zealand heifers, respectively; the overall mean prediction
accuracy was 0.37. Therefore, there is a benefit
in collaboration, because phenotypic information for
DMI from other countries can be used to augment the
accuracy of genomic evaluations of individual countries.
AB - With the aim of increasing the accuracy of genomic
estimated breeding values for dry matter intake (DMI)
in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle, data from 10 research
herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia
were combined. The DMI records were available on
10,701 parity 1 to 5 records from 6,953 cows, as well
as on 1,784 growing heifers. Predicted DMI at 70 d
in milk was used as the phenotype for the lactating
animals, and the average DMI measured during a 60- to
70-d test period at approximately 200 d of age was
used as the phenotype for the growing heifers. After
editing, there were 583,375 genetic markers obtained
from either actual high-density single nucleotide polymorphism
(SNP) genotypes or imputed from 54,001
marker SNP genotypes. Genetic correlations between
the populations were estimated using genomic REML.
The accuracy of genomic prediction was evaluated for
the following scenarios: (1) within-country only, by
fixing the correlations among populations to zero, (2)
using near-unity correlations among populations and
assuming the same trait in each population, and (3)
a sharing data scenario using estimated genetic correlations
among populations. For these 3 scenarios, the
data set was divided into 10 sub-populations stratified
by progeny group of sires; 9 of these sub-populations
were used (in turn) for the genomic prediction and the
tenth was used for calculation of the accuracy (correlation
adjusted for heritability). A fourth scenario to
quantify the benefit for countries that do not record
DMI was investigated (i.e., having an entire country as
the validation population and excluding this country
in the development of the genomic predictions). The
optimal scenario, which was sharing data, resulted in
a mean prediction accuracy of 0.44, ranging from 0.37
(Denmark) to 0.54 (the Netherlands). Assuming nearunity
among-country genetic correlations, the mean
accuracy of prediction dropped to 0.40, and the mean
within-country accuracy was 0.30. If no records were
available in a country, the accuracy based on the other
populations ranged from 0.23 to 0.53 for the milking
cows, but were only 0.03 and 0.19 for Australian and
New Zealand heifers, respectively; the overall mean prediction
accuracy was 0.37. Therefore, there is a benefit
in collaboration, because phenotypic information for
DMI from other countries can be used to augment the
accuracy of genomic evaluations of individual countries.
U2 - 10.3168/jds.2014-9257
DO - 10.3168/jds.2014-9257
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-0302
VL - 98
SP - 6522
EP - 6534
JO - Journal of Dairy Science
JF - Journal of Dairy Science
IS - 9
ER -