TY - JOUR
T1 - Habitat monitoring in the wider countryside
T2 - A case study on the pursuit of innovation in red deer management
AU - Maffey, Georgina
AU - Reed, Mark
AU - Irvine, R. Justin
AU - van der Wal, René
PY - 2013/10/15
Y1 - 2013/10/15
N2 - Policy frameworks for protected areas, such as the EU habitats directive, ensure that environmental monitoring takes place to assess the condition of these sites. However, this monitoring rarely extends to the wider countryside, and there is no obligation for private landowners to detect trends in habitat condition. Using the diffusion of innovations model as an analytical framework we conducted a series of semi-structured interviews to consider the uptake of habitat impact assessment methods throughout a community involved in private land use pursuits in Scotland. It was found that although the community as a whole recognises the benefits of habitat impact assessments there are a number of barriers to their uptake, including the complexity of data gathering and interpretation, and uncertainty around who should be responsible for the conduct of assessments. Analysing the uptake of an innovation at an early stage, rather than retrospectively as is commonly done, highlights the potential for non-adoption and could therefore inform the reinvention of the innovation. In this instance reinvention could lead to more appropriate monitoring methods, which, if taken up, could reduce the need for legislative intervention in situations where both public and private interests need to be considered.
AB - Policy frameworks for protected areas, such as the EU habitats directive, ensure that environmental monitoring takes place to assess the condition of these sites. However, this monitoring rarely extends to the wider countryside, and there is no obligation for private landowners to detect trends in habitat condition. Using the diffusion of innovations model as an analytical framework we conducted a series of semi-structured interviews to consider the uptake of habitat impact assessment methods throughout a community involved in private land use pursuits in Scotland. It was found that although the community as a whole recognises the benefits of habitat impact assessments there are a number of barriers to their uptake, including the complexity of data gathering and interpretation, and uncertainty around who should be responsible for the conduct of assessments. Analysing the uptake of an innovation at an early stage, rather than retrospectively as is commonly done, highlights the potential for non-adoption and could therefore inform the reinvention of the innovation. In this instance reinvention could lead to more appropriate monitoring methods, which, if taken up, could reduce the need for legislative intervention in situations where both public and private interests need to be considered.
KW - Diffusion of innovations
KW - Habitat monitoring
KW - Private land
KW - Red deer management
KW - Wildlife management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880345448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.022
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 23860380
AN - SCOPUS:84880345448
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 128
SP - 779
EP - 786
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
ER -