How can impact strategies be developed that better support universities to address twenty-first-century challenges?

MSR Reed*, Saskia Gent, Fran Seballos, Jayne Glass, Regina Hansda, MFFM Fischer-Moller

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To better address twenty-first-century challenges, research institutions often develop and publish research impact strategies, but as a tool, impact strategies are poorly understood. This study provides the first formal analysis of impact strategies from the UK, Canada, Australia, Denmark, New Zealand and Hong Kong, China, and from independent research institutes. Two types of strategy emerged. First, ‘achieving impact’ strategies tended to be bottom-up and co-productive, with a strong emphasis on partnerships and engagement, but they were more likely to target specific beneficiaries with structured implementation plans, use boundary organisations to co-produce research and impact, and recognise impact with less reliance on extrinsic incentives. Second, ‘enabling impact’ strategies were more top-down and incentive-driven, developed to build impact capacity and culture across an institution, faculty or centre, with a strong focus on partnerships and engagement, and they invested in dedicated impact teams and academic impact roles, supported by extrinsic incentives including promotion criteria. This typology offers a new way to categorise, analyse and understand research impact strategies, alongside insights that may be used by practitioners to guide the design of future strategies, considering the limitations of top-down, incentive-driven approaches versus more bottom-up, co-productive approaches.
Original languageEnglish
JournalResearch for All
Volume6
Issue number1
Early online date22 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 22 Nov 2022

Keywords

  • research impact
  • impact strategy
  • impact culture
  • knowledge exchange
  • KMb

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How can impact strategies be developed that better support universities to address twenty-first-century challenges?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this