How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants?

Silvana Mattiello*, Monica Battini, Giuseppe De Rosa, Fabio Napolitano, Cathy Dwyer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Until now, most research has focused on the development of indicators of negative welfare, and relatively few studies provide information on valid, reliable, and feasible indicators addressing positive aspects of animal welfare. However, a lack of suffering does not guarantee that animals are experiencing a positive welfare state. The aim of the present review is to identify promising valid and reliable animal-based indicators for the ssessment of positive welfare that might be included in welfare assessment protocols for ruminants, and to discuss them in the light of the five domains model, highlighting possible gaps to be filled by future research. Based on the existing literature in the main databases, each indicator was evaluated in terms of its validity, reliability, and on-farm feasibility. Some valid indicators were identified, but a lot of the validity evidence is based on their absence when a negative situation is present; furthermore, only a few indicators are available in the domains of Nutrition and Health. Reliability has been seldom addressed. On-farm easibility could be increased by developing specific sampling strategies and/or relying on the use of video- or automatic-recording devices. In conclusion, several indicators are potentially available (e.g., synchronisation of lying and feeding, coat or fleece condition, qualitative behaviour assessment), but further research is required.

Original languageEnglish
Article number758
Number of pages27
JournalAnimals
Volume9
Issue number10
Early online date2 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 2 Oct 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ruminants
ruminants
farms
Animal Welfare
fleece
Psychological Stress
Research
Reproducibility of Results
animal welfare
animals
Databases
nutrition
Equipment and Supplies
Health
sampling
Farms

Keywords

  • Animal welfare
  • Buffaloes
  • Cattle
  • Five domains
  • Goats
  • Positive indicators
  • Ruminants
  • Sheep

Cite this

Mattiello, S., Battini, M., De Rosa, G., Napolitano, F., & Dwyer, C. (2019). How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants? Animals, 9(10), [758]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100758
Mattiello, Silvana ; Battini, Monica ; De Rosa, Giuseppe ; Napolitano, Fabio ; Dwyer, Cathy. / How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants?. In: Animals. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 10.
@article{72bef49fdff545b1b3d94347c2edcfff,
title = "How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants?",
abstract = "Until now, most research has focused on the development of indicators of negative welfare, and relatively few studies provide information on valid, reliable, and feasible indicators addressing positive aspects of animal welfare. However, a lack of suffering does not guarantee that animals are experiencing a positive welfare state. The aim of the present review is to identify promising valid and reliable animal-based indicators for the ssessment of positive welfare that might be included in welfare assessment protocols for ruminants, and to discuss them in the light of the five domains model, highlighting possible gaps to be filled by future research. Based on the existing literature in the main databases, each indicator was evaluated in terms of its validity, reliability, and on-farm feasibility. Some valid indicators were identified, but a lot of the validity evidence is based on their absence when a negative situation is present; furthermore, only a few indicators are available in the domains of Nutrition and Health. Reliability has been seldom addressed. On-farm easibility could be increased by developing specific sampling strategies and/or relying on the use of video- or automatic-recording devices. In conclusion, several indicators are potentially available (e.g., synchronisation of lying and feeding, coat or fleece condition, qualitative behaviour assessment), but further research is required.",
keywords = "Animal welfare, Buffaloes, Cattle, Five domains, Goats, Positive indicators, Ruminants, Sheep",
author = "Silvana Mattiello and Monica Battini and {De Rosa}, Giuseppe and Fabio Napolitano and Cathy Dwyer",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.3390/ani9100758",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Animals",
issn = "2076-2615",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "10",

}

Mattiello, S, Battini, M, De Rosa, G, Napolitano, F & Dwyer, C 2019, 'How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants?', Animals, vol. 9, no. 10, 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100758

How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants? / Mattiello, Silvana; Battini, Monica; De Rosa, Giuseppe; Napolitano, Fabio; Dwyer, Cathy.

In: Animals, Vol. 9, No. 10, 758, 02.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants?

AU - Mattiello, Silvana

AU - Battini, Monica

AU - De Rosa, Giuseppe

AU - Napolitano, Fabio

AU - Dwyer, Cathy

PY - 2019/10/2

Y1 - 2019/10/2

N2 - Until now, most research has focused on the development of indicators of negative welfare, and relatively few studies provide information on valid, reliable, and feasible indicators addressing positive aspects of animal welfare. However, a lack of suffering does not guarantee that animals are experiencing a positive welfare state. The aim of the present review is to identify promising valid and reliable animal-based indicators for the ssessment of positive welfare that might be included in welfare assessment protocols for ruminants, and to discuss them in the light of the five domains model, highlighting possible gaps to be filled by future research. Based on the existing literature in the main databases, each indicator was evaluated in terms of its validity, reliability, and on-farm feasibility. Some valid indicators were identified, but a lot of the validity evidence is based on their absence when a negative situation is present; furthermore, only a few indicators are available in the domains of Nutrition and Health. Reliability has been seldom addressed. On-farm easibility could be increased by developing specific sampling strategies and/or relying on the use of video- or automatic-recording devices. In conclusion, several indicators are potentially available (e.g., synchronisation of lying and feeding, coat or fleece condition, qualitative behaviour assessment), but further research is required.

AB - Until now, most research has focused on the development of indicators of negative welfare, and relatively few studies provide information on valid, reliable, and feasible indicators addressing positive aspects of animal welfare. However, a lack of suffering does not guarantee that animals are experiencing a positive welfare state. The aim of the present review is to identify promising valid and reliable animal-based indicators for the ssessment of positive welfare that might be included in welfare assessment protocols for ruminants, and to discuss them in the light of the five domains model, highlighting possible gaps to be filled by future research. Based on the existing literature in the main databases, each indicator was evaluated in terms of its validity, reliability, and on-farm feasibility. Some valid indicators were identified, but a lot of the validity evidence is based on their absence when a negative situation is present; furthermore, only a few indicators are available in the domains of Nutrition and Health. Reliability has been seldom addressed. On-farm easibility could be increased by developing specific sampling strategies and/or relying on the use of video- or automatic-recording devices. In conclusion, several indicators are potentially available (e.g., synchronisation of lying and feeding, coat or fleece condition, qualitative behaviour assessment), but further research is required.

KW - Animal welfare

KW - Buffaloes

KW - Cattle

KW - Five domains

KW - Goats

KW - Positive indicators

KW - Ruminants

KW - Sheep

U2 - 10.3390/ani9100758

DO - 10.3390/ani9100758

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31581658

AN - SCOPUS:85073440443

VL - 9

JO - Animals

JF - Animals

SN - 2076-2615

IS - 10

M1 - 758

ER -

Mattiello S, Battini M, De Rosa G, Napolitano F, Dwyer C. How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants? Animals. 2019 Oct 2;9(10). 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100758