How do individuals and groups perceive wetland functioning? Fuzzy cognitive mapping of wetland perceptions in Uganda

C Bosma, K Glenk, P Novo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wetlands are critical natural resources around the globe, providing many direct and indirect benefits to local communities. However, wetland degradation and conversion to other land uses are widespread. Sustainable wetland management requires an understanding of stakeholders’ perceptions of the ecosystem and its management. This paper uses fuzzy cognitive mapping to capture individual stakeholder perceptions and group knowledge of wetland ecosystems in order to assess areas of consensus and opposing interests between different stakeholders and to develop future management scenarios. For this purpose, the Rushebeya-Kanyabaha wetland, which is one of the few wetlands in southwest Uganda that is still largely intact, is used as a case study. Our findings reveal differences in perceptions between different resource users. Papyrus harvesters, beekeepers, fishermen, wetland non-users, and hunters associate the largest livelihood benefits with a wetland conservation scenario, while farmers and government officials perceive increased agricultural production in the wetland area to be more livelihood enhancing. This poses a challenge to sustainable wetland management. The scenario results also suggest that centralized top-down laws and rules on wetland use are not sufficient for maintaining the wetland ecosystem. Therefore, there is a need to develop shared understanding through bottom-up approaches to wetland management that are nested within national regulatory frameworks, ideally combined with awareness building and knowledge sharing on the ecological benefits of the wetland.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181 - 196
Number of pages16
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume60
Early online date28 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 28 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

wetland
wetland management
stakeholder
bottom-up approach
regulatory framework
agricultural production
natural resource
land use
ecosystem
resource

Bibliographical note

1031184

Keywords

  • Conservation
  • Fuzzy cognitive mapping
  • Natural resource management
  • Stakeholder perceptions
  • Uganda
  • Wetlands

Cite this

@article{c989a33d97ec4c519b99b2cb1ce2891c,
title = "How do individuals and groups perceive wetland functioning? Fuzzy cognitive mapping of wetland perceptions in Uganda",
abstract = "Wetlands are critical natural resources around the globe, providing many direct and indirect benefits to local communities. However, wetland degradation and conversion to other land uses are widespread. Sustainable wetland management requires an understanding of stakeholders’ perceptions of the ecosystem and its management. This paper uses fuzzy cognitive mapping to capture individual stakeholder perceptions and group knowledge of wetland ecosystems in order to assess areas of consensus and opposing interests between different stakeholders and to develop future management scenarios. For this purpose, the Rushebeya-Kanyabaha wetland, which is one of the few wetlands in southwest Uganda that is still largely intact, is used as a case study. Our findings reveal differences in perceptions between different resource users. Papyrus harvesters, beekeepers, fishermen, wetland non-users, and hunters associate the largest livelihood benefits with a wetland conservation scenario, while farmers and government officials perceive increased agricultural production in the wetland area to be more livelihood enhancing. This poses a challenge to sustainable wetland management. The scenario results also suggest that centralized top-down laws and rules on wetland use are not sufficient for maintaining the wetland ecosystem. Therefore, there is a need to develop shared understanding through bottom-up approaches to wetland management that are nested within national regulatory frameworks, ideally combined with awareness building and knowledge sharing on the ecological benefits of the wetland.",
keywords = "Conservation, Fuzzy cognitive mapping, Natural resource management, Stakeholder perceptions, Uganda, Wetlands",
author = "C Bosma and K Glenk and P Novo",
note = "1031184",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "181 -- 196",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

How do individuals and groups perceive wetland functioning? Fuzzy cognitive mapping of wetland perceptions in Uganda. / Bosma, C; Glenk, K; Novo, P.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 60, 28.10.2016, p. 181 - 196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do individuals and groups perceive wetland functioning? Fuzzy cognitive mapping of wetland perceptions in Uganda

AU - Bosma, C

AU - Glenk, K

AU - Novo, P

N1 - 1031184

PY - 2016/10/28

Y1 - 2016/10/28

N2 - Wetlands are critical natural resources around the globe, providing many direct and indirect benefits to local communities. However, wetland degradation and conversion to other land uses are widespread. Sustainable wetland management requires an understanding of stakeholders’ perceptions of the ecosystem and its management. This paper uses fuzzy cognitive mapping to capture individual stakeholder perceptions and group knowledge of wetland ecosystems in order to assess areas of consensus and opposing interests between different stakeholders and to develop future management scenarios. For this purpose, the Rushebeya-Kanyabaha wetland, which is one of the few wetlands in southwest Uganda that is still largely intact, is used as a case study. Our findings reveal differences in perceptions between different resource users. Papyrus harvesters, beekeepers, fishermen, wetland non-users, and hunters associate the largest livelihood benefits with a wetland conservation scenario, while farmers and government officials perceive increased agricultural production in the wetland area to be more livelihood enhancing. This poses a challenge to sustainable wetland management. The scenario results also suggest that centralized top-down laws and rules on wetland use are not sufficient for maintaining the wetland ecosystem. Therefore, there is a need to develop shared understanding through bottom-up approaches to wetland management that are nested within national regulatory frameworks, ideally combined with awareness building and knowledge sharing on the ecological benefits of the wetland.

AB - Wetlands are critical natural resources around the globe, providing many direct and indirect benefits to local communities. However, wetland degradation and conversion to other land uses are widespread. Sustainable wetland management requires an understanding of stakeholders’ perceptions of the ecosystem and its management. This paper uses fuzzy cognitive mapping to capture individual stakeholder perceptions and group knowledge of wetland ecosystems in order to assess areas of consensus and opposing interests between different stakeholders and to develop future management scenarios. For this purpose, the Rushebeya-Kanyabaha wetland, which is one of the few wetlands in southwest Uganda that is still largely intact, is used as a case study. Our findings reveal differences in perceptions between different resource users. Papyrus harvesters, beekeepers, fishermen, wetland non-users, and hunters associate the largest livelihood benefits with a wetland conservation scenario, while farmers and government officials perceive increased agricultural production in the wetland area to be more livelihood enhancing. This poses a challenge to sustainable wetland management. The scenario results also suggest that centralized top-down laws and rules on wetland use are not sufficient for maintaining the wetland ecosystem. Therefore, there is a need to develop shared understanding through bottom-up approaches to wetland management that are nested within national regulatory frameworks, ideally combined with awareness building and knowledge sharing on the ecological benefits of the wetland.

KW - Conservation

KW - Fuzzy cognitive mapping

KW - Natural resource management

KW - Stakeholder perceptions

KW - Uganda

KW - Wetlands

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.010

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 181

EP - 196

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -