How sure can you be? A framework for considering delivery uncertainty in benefit assessments based on stated preference methods

K Glenk, S Colombo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The economic valuation of benefits resulting from environmental policies and interventions often assumes that environmental outcomes are certain. In fact, these outcomes are typically uncertain. This article proposes a methodological approach to incorporate delivery uncertainty into benefit estimation based on stated preference methods. In the study design of a choice experiment survey on land-based climate change mitigation, we explicitly include delivery uncertainty as the risk that a proposed mitigation project fails to deliver emission savings. We find that respondents’ preferences do not change significantly after being confronted with choices that included risk of failure. However, failure risk itself does have an important impact on the preferences for delivering emission reductions. We show that delivery uncertainty can have a large impact on stated preference estimation of benefits of public programmes. This result should condition conclusions drawn from ex-ante environmental cost-benefit analyses that make use of such benefit estimates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25 - 46
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Agricultural Economics
Volume62
Issue number1
Publication statusFirst published - 2011

Bibliographical note

1023337

Keywords

  • Choice experiments
  • Stated preference methods

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How sure can you be? A framework for considering delivery uncertainty in benefit assessments based on stated preference methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this