TY - JOUR
T1 - Improvement of the Welfare Quality scoring model for dairy cows to fit experts’ opinion
AU - Lardy, Romain
AU - Botreau, Raphaele
AU - de Boyer des Roches, Alice
AU - van Eerdenburg, Frank J.C.M.
AU - de Graaf, Sophie
AU - Haskell, MJ
AU - Kirchner, Marlene K.
AU - Mounier, Luc
AU - Kjosevski, Miro
AU - Tuyttens, Frank
AU - Veissier, Isabelle
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - After several years of implementation, the original Welfare Quality scoring model for dairy cows appears to be highly sensitive to the number and cleanliness of drinkers and not enough to the prevalence of diseases, and as a consequence may not fit the opinion of some animal welfare experts. The present paper aims to improve the Welfare Quality calculations for the criteria ‘Absence of prolonged thirst’ and ‘Absence of disease’ in dairy cows, so that the results are more sensitive to input data and better fit experts’ opinion. First, we modified the calculation of ‘Absence of prolonged thirst’ by linearising the calculation for drinkers’ availability to avoid threshold effects. Second, we modified the calculation of ‘Absence of disease’ by applying a Choquet integral on the three lowest spline-based scores for each health disorder to limit compensation between health disorders. Third, we performed a global sensitivity analysis of the original and the alternative scoring models. Fourth, we compared the results obtained with the original and the alternative models with eight experts’ opinions on two subsets composed of 44 and 60 farms, respectively, inspected using the Welfare Quality protocol and on which experts gave their opinion on the overall level of animal welfare. Results show that the alternative model significantly reduced the ‘threshold effects’ related to the number of drinkers and the compensation between health disorders. On the first subset, the alternative model fits the experts’ opinion slightly better than the original model (P = 0.061). On the second subset, the models performed equally. In conclusion, the proposed refinements for calculating scores are validated since they significantly reduced ‘threshold effects’ and the influence of measures related to drinkers. It also reduced the compensation between health disorders by considering only the three lowest scores and thus increasing the influence of measures related to health disorders, and slightly improve at overall score level the accordance with experts’ opinion.
AB - After several years of implementation, the original Welfare Quality scoring model for dairy cows appears to be highly sensitive to the number and cleanliness of drinkers and not enough to the prevalence of diseases, and as a consequence may not fit the opinion of some animal welfare experts. The present paper aims to improve the Welfare Quality calculations for the criteria ‘Absence of prolonged thirst’ and ‘Absence of disease’ in dairy cows, so that the results are more sensitive to input data and better fit experts’ opinion. First, we modified the calculation of ‘Absence of prolonged thirst’ by linearising the calculation for drinkers’ availability to avoid threshold effects. Second, we modified the calculation of ‘Absence of disease’ by applying a Choquet integral on the three lowest spline-based scores for each health disorder to limit compensation between health disorders. Third, we performed a global sensitivity analysis of the original and the alternative scoring models. Fourth, we compared the results obtained with the original and the alternative models with eight experts’ opinions on two subsets composed of 44 and 60 farms, respectively, inspected using the Welfare Quality protocol and on which experts gave their opinion on the overall level of animal welfare. Results show that the alternative model significantly reduced the ‘threshold effects’ related to the number of drinkers and the compensation between health disorders. On the first subset, the alternative model fits the experts’ opinion slightly better than the original model (P = 0.061). On the second subset, the models performed equally. In conclusion, the proposed refinements for calculating scores are validated since they significantly reduced ‘threshold effects’ and the influence of measures related to drinkers. It also reduced the compensation between health disorders by considering only the three lowest scores and thus increasing the influence of measures related to health disorders, and slightly improve at overall score level the accordance with experts’ opinion.
KW - Animal well-being
KW - Cattle
KW - Expert opinion
KW - Multicriteria evaluation
KW - Sensitivity analysis
KW - Animals
KW - Animal Welfare
KW - Prevalence
KW - Housing, Animal
KW - Farms
KW - Dairying/methods
KW - Female
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176584766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.animal.2023.101018
DO - 10.1016/j.animal.2023.101018
M3 - Article
C2 - 37948890
SN - 1751-7311
VL - 17
JO - Animal
JF - Animal
IS - 11
M1 - 101018
ER -