Abstract
Achieving high-yielding crops while also improving nitrogen use efficiency is a significant challenge for agricultural production in Bangladesh. We investigated the impacts of applying nitrogen (N) using different management options in wetland rice on a calcareous dark gray soil over three seasons. These included (1) the recommended dose of available N as prilled urea, (2) the recommended N dose plus 25% extra of available N as prilled urea, (3) 25% less than the recommended dose of available N as prilled urea, (4) the recommended dose of prilled urea in 2 t ha−1 cow dung, (5) the recommended dose as urea super granules (USGs) by deep placement, (6) 4 t ha−1 biochar with the recommended dose of prilled urea, and (7) Zero N. It was found that the growth, yield, and
N use efficiency (NUE) were significantly different from the results obtained for prilled urea in all the alternative fertilizer options. The deep placement of USG consistently increased plant height, total number of tillers per plant, effective tillers per plant, chlorophyll content, panicle length, grains per panicle, and 1000-grain weight. The yield increases over recommended prilled urea were 5.22% for USG followed by biochar with the recommended dose. Similarly, using the deep placement of USG gave the highest yield and harvest index. In addition, compared to the recommended dose of prilled urea, the deep placement of USG increased NUE by 13%, agronomic N efficiency by 20%, and recovery N use efficiency by 19%. This suggests the rate of N application could be reduced
by up to 8% without impacting yield by using deep placement of USG instead of prilled urea. The cost–benefit ratio was higher for the deep placement of USG than all other treatments. Biochar with the recommended dose of prilled urea also showed good results in terms of growth, yield, and NUE (41.8, 43.0, and 41.7, respectively, during three sequential years), but the extra cost of the biochar
reduced the cost–benefit ratio. These findings suggest that the deep placement of USG is the best option for improving the yield of rice while also improving N use efficiency.
N use efficiency (NUE) were significantly different from the results obtained for prilled urea in all the alternative fertilizer options. The deep placement of USG consistently increased plant height, total number of tillers per plant, effective tillers per plant, chlorophyll content, panicle length, grains per panicle, and 1000-grain weight. The yield increases over recommended prilled urea were 5.22% for USG followed by biochar with the recommended dose. Similarly, using the deep placement of USG gave the highest yield and harvest index. In addition, compared to the recommended dose of prilled urea, the deep placement of USG increased NUE by 13%, agronomic N efficiency by 20%, and recovery N use efficiency by 19%. This suggests the rate of N application could be reduced
by up to 8% without impacting yield by using deep placement of USG instead of prilled urea. The cost–benefit ratio was higher for the deep placement of USG than all other treatments. Biochar with the recommended dose of prilled urea also showed good results in terms of growth, yield, and NUE (41.8, 43.0, and 41.7, respectively, during three sequential years), but the extra cost of the biochar
reduced the cost–benefit ratio. These findings suggest that the deep placement of USG is the best option for improving the yield of rice while also improving N use efficiency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2758 |
| Journal | Agronomy |
| Early online date | 12 Nov 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Print publication - 12 Nov 2024 |
Keywords
- rice
- nitrogen
- biochar
- urea
