Abstract
A better, more effective dialogue is needed between biodiversity science and
policy to underpin the sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity. Many initiatives
exist to improve communication, but these largely conform to a ‘linear’ or technocratic
model of communication in which scientific ‘‘facts’’ are transmitted directly to policy
advisers to ‘‘solve problems’’. While this model can help start a dialogue, it is, on its own,
insufficient, as decision taking is complex, iterative and often selective in the information
used. Here, we draw on the literature, interviews and a workshop with individuals working
at the interface between biodiversity science and government policy development to present practical recommendations aimed at individuals, teams, organisations and funders.
Building on these recommendations, we stress the need to: (a) frame research and policy
jointly; (b) promote inter- and trans-disciplinary research and ‘‘multi-domain’’ working
groups that include both scientists and policy makers from various fields and sectors;
(c) put in place structures and incentive schemes that support interactive dialogue in the
long-term. These are changes that are needed in light of continuing loss of biodiversity and
its consequences for societal dependence on and benefits from nature.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 387 - 404 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Biodiversity and Conservation |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | First published - 2014 |
Bibliographical note
1023312Keywords
- Biodiversity conservation
- Biodiversity policy
- Decision-making
- Knowledge
- Science-policy interfaces
- Sustainability