Index selection in terminal sires improves lamb performance at finishing

GC Marquez, W Haresign, MH Davies, R Roehe, L Bunger, G Simm, RM Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)


Lamb meat is often perceived by consumers as fatty, and consumption has decreased in recent decades. A lean growth index was developed in the UK for terminal sire breeds to increase carcass lean content and constrain fat content at a constant age end point. The purposes of this study were 1) to evaluate the effects of index selection of terminal sires on their crossbred offspring at fi nishing and 2) to evaluate its effectiveness within terminal sire breeds. Approximately 70% of lambs marketed in the UK have been sired by rams of breeds typically thought of as specialized terminal sires. The most widely used are Charollais, Suffolk, and Texel. These breeds participated in sire referencing schemes from the early 1990s by sharing rams among fl ocks selected on the lean growth index. From 1999 to 2002 approximately 15 “high” and 15 “low” lean growth index score rams were selected from within their sire referencing schemes and mated to Welsh and Scottish Mule ewes. Their crossbred offspring were commercially reared on 3 farms in the UK. Lambs were fi nished to an estimated 11% subcutaneous fat by visual evaluation. At fi nishing, lambs were weighed, ultrasonically scanned, and assessed for condition score and conformation. Records were obtained for 6356 lambs on fi nishing BW (FWT), ultrasonic muscle depth (UMD), ultrasonic fat depth, overall condition score (OCS), and conformation of gigot, loin, and shoulder. Ultrasonic fat depth was log transformed (logUFD) to approach normality. High-index-sired lambs were heavier at fi nishing (1.2 ± 0.2 kg) with thicker UMD (0.7 ± 0.2 mm) and less logUFD (0.08 ± 0.01 mm; P < 0.05). There were no differences in OCS or conformation based on the sire index or breed (P > 0.08). Suffolk-sired lambs were heavier than Charollais (1.0 ± 0.3 kg), which were heavier than Texel (0.9 ± 0.3 kg; P < 0.001). Texel-sired lambs had thicker UMD than Charollais (0.7 ± 0.2 mm; P < 0.001) but were not different than Suffolk. Charollais-sired lambs had greater logUFD than both Texel (0.098 ± 0.016 mm) and Suffolk (0.061 ± 0.017 mm) sired lambs (P < 0.001). Within a breed, high- and low-index-sired lambs differed in performance with the exceptions of FWT and UMD in Suffolks. Index selection produced heavier and leaner lambs at fi nishing. Producers have fl exibility in choosing the terminal sire that best fi ts their production system.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38 - 43
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Animal Science
Issue number1
Publication statusPrint publication - 2013

Bibliographical note



  • Crossbred lambs
  • Index selection
  • Lamb performance
  • Terminal sire


Dive into the research topics of 'Index selection in terminal sires improves lamb performance at finishing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this