Abstract
Tail biting is a serious animal welfare and economic problem in pig production. Tail docking, which reduces but does not eliminate
tail biting, remains widespread. However, in the EU tail docking may not be used routinely, and some ‘alternative’ forms of pig
production and certain countries do not allow tail docking at all. Against this background, using a novel approach focusing on
research where tail injuries were quantified, we review the measures that can be used to control tail biting in pigs without tail
docking. Using this strict criterion, there was good evidence that manipulable substrates and feeder space affect damaging tail
biting. Only epidemiological evidence was available for effects of temperature and season, and the effect of stocking density
was unclear. Studies suggest that group size has little effect, and the effects of nutrition, disease and breed require further
investigation. The review identifies a number of knowledge gaps and promising avenues for future research into prevention and
mitigation. We illustrate the diversity of hypotheses concerning how different proposed risk factors might increase tail biting
through their effect on each other or on the proposed underlying processes of tail biting. A quantitative comparison of the efficacy
of different methods of provision of manipulable materials, and a review of current practices in countries and assurance schemes
where tail docking is banned, both suggest that daily provision of small quantities of destructible, manipulable natural materials
can be of considerable benefit. Further comparative research is needed into materials, such as ropes, which are compatible with
slatted floors. Also, materials which double as fuel for anaerobic digesters could be utilised. As well as optimising housing and
management to reduce risk, it is important to detect and treat tail biting as soon as it occurs. Early warning signs before the
first bloody tails appear, such as pigs holding their tails tucked under, could in future be automatically detected using precision
livestock farming methods enabling earlier reaction and prevention of tail damage. However, there is a lack of scientific studies
on how best to respond to outbreaks: the effectiveness of, for example, removing biters and/or bitten pigs, increasing enrichment,
or applying substances to tails should be investigated. Finally, some breeding companies are exploring options for reducing the
genetic propensity to tail bite. If these various approaches to reduce tail biting are implemented we propose that the need for tail
docking will be reduced.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1479 - 1497 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Animal |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Print publication - 2014 |
Bibliographical note
20702201023379
Keywords
- Behaviour
- Enrichment
- Housing
- Pigs
- Tail biting