Interactions between profit and welfare on extensive sheep farms

AW Stott, B Vosough Ahmadi, CM Dwyer, B Kupiec, C Morgan-Davies, CE Milne, S Ringrose, P Goddard, K Phillips, A Waterhouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Extensive sheep farming systems make an important contribution to socio-economic well-being and the ‘ecosystem services’ that flow from large areas of the UK and elsewhere. They are therefore subject to much policy intervention. However, the animal welfare implications of such interventions and their economic drivers are rarely considered. Under Defra project AW1024 (a further study to assess the interaction between economics, husbandry and animal welfare in large, extensively managed sheep flocks) we therefore assessed the interaction between profit and animal welfare on extensive sheep farms. A detailed inventory of resources, resource deployment and technical performance was constructed for 20 commercial extensive sheep farms in Great Britain (equal numbers from the Scottish Highlands, Cumbria, Peak District and mid-Wales). Farms were drawn from focus groups in these regions where participative research with farmers added further information. These data were summarised and presented to a panel of 12 experts for welfare assessment. We used two welfare assessment methods one drawn from animal welfare science (‘needs’ based) the other from management science (Service Quality Modelling). The methods gave complementary results. The inventory data were also used to build a linear programme (LP) model of sheep, labour and feed-resource management monthby- month on each farm throughout the farming year. By setting the LP to adjust farm management to maximise gross margin under each farm’s circumstances we had an objective way to explore resource allocations, their constraints and welfare implications under alternative policy response scenarios. Regression of indicators of extensification (labour per ewe, in-bye land per ewe, hill area per ewe and lambs weaned per ewe) on overall welfare score explained 0.66 of variation with labour and lambs weaned per ewe both positive coefficients. Neither gross margin nor flock size were correlated with welfare score. Gross margin was also uncorrelated with these indicators of extensification with the exception of labour/ewe, which was negatively correlated with flock size and hence with gross margin. These results suggest animal welfare is best served by reduced extensification while greater profits are found in flock expansion with reduced labour input per ewe and no increase in other inputs or in productivity. Such potential conflicts should be considered as policy adjusts to meet the requirements for sustainable land use in the hills and uplands.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57 - 64
Number of pages8
JournalAnimal Welfare
Volume21(S1)
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 2012

Fingerprint

profits and margins
ewes
sheep
farms
labor
animal welfare
flocks
linear programming
highlands
lambs
farming systems
economics
focus groups
farm management
natural resource management
resource allocation
Wales
ecosystem services
socioeconomics
land use

Keywords

  • Animal welfare
  • Economics
  • Linear programming
  • Profit
  • Service quality modelling
  • Sheep

Cite this

Stott, AW ; Vosough Ahmadi, B ; Dwyer, CM ; Kupiec, B ; Morgan-Davies, C ; Milne, CE ; Ringrose, S ; Goddard, P ; Phillips, K ; Waterhouse, A. / Interactions between profit and welfare on extensive sheep farms. In: Animal Welfare. 2012 ; Vol. 21(S1). pp. 57 - 64.
@article{2c31a8d113c14cfeafee16fbb3d03fbd,
title = "Interactions between profit and welfare on extensive sheep farms",
abstract = "Extensive sheep farming systems make an important contribution to socio-economic well-being and the ‘ecosystem services’ that flow from large areas of the UK and elsewhere. They are therefore subject to much policy intervention. However, the animal welfare implications of such interventions and their economic drivers are rarely considered. Under Defra project AW1024 (a further study to assess the interaction between economics, husbandry and animal welfare in large, extensively managed sheep flocks) we therefore assessed the interaction between profit and animal welfare on extensive sheep farms. A detailed inventory of resources, resource deployment and technical performance was constructed for 20 commercial extensive sheep farms in Great Britain (equal numbers from the Scottish Highlands, Cumbria, Peak District and mid-Wales). Farms were drawn from focus groups in these regions where participative research with farmers added further information. These data were summarised and presented to a panel of 12 experts for welfare assessment. We used two welfare assessment methods one drawn from animal welfare science (‘needs’ based) the other from management science (Service Quality Modelling). The methods gave complementary results. The inventory data were also used to build a linear programme (LP) model of sheep, labour and feed-resource management monthby- month on each farm throughout the farming year. By setting the LP to adjust farm management to maximise gross margin under each farm’s circumstances we had an objective way to explore resource allocations, their constraints and welfare implications under alternative policy response scenarios. Regression of indicators of extensification (labour per ewe, in-bye land per ewe, hill area per ewe and lambs weaned per ewe) on overall welfare score explained 0.66 of variation with labour and lambs weaned per ewe both positive coefficients. Neither gross margin nor flock size were correlated with welfare score. Gross margin was also uncorrelated with these indicators of extensification with the exception of labour/ewe, which was negatively correlated with flock size and hence with gross margin. These results suggest animal welfare is best served by reduced extensification while greater profits are found in flock expansion with reduced labour input per ewe and no increase in other inputs or in productivity. Such potential conflicts should be considered as policy adjusts to meet the requirements for sustainable land use in the hills and uplands.",
keywords = "Animal welfare, Economics, Linear programming, Profit, Service quality modelling, Sheep",
author = "AW Stott and {Vosough Ahmadi}, B and CM Dwyer and B Kupiec and C Morgan-Davies and CE Milne and S Ringrose and P Goddard and K Phillips and A Waterhouse",
year = "2012",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13345905673683",
language = "English",
volume = "21(S1)",
pages = "57 -- 64",
journal = "Animal Welfare",
issn = "0962-7286",
publisher = "Universities Federation for Animal Welfare",

}

Stott, AW, Vosough Ahmadi, B, Dwyer, CM, Kupiec, B, Morgan-Davies, C, Milne, CE, Ringrose, S, Goddard, P, Phillips, K & Waterhouse, A 2012, 'Interactions between profit and welfare on extensive sheep farms', Animal Welfare, vol. 21(S1), pp. 57 - 64. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13345905673683

Interactions between profit and welfare on extensive sheep farms. / Stott, AW; Vosough Ahmadi, B; Dwyer, CM; Kupiec, B; Morgan-Davies, C; Milne, CE; Ringrose, S; Goddard, P; Phillips, K; Waterhouse, A.

In: Animal Welfare, Vol. 21(S1), 2012, p. 57 - 64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interactions between profit and welfare on extensive sheep farms

AU - Stott, AW

AU - Vosough Ahmadi, B

AU - Dwyer, CM

AU - Kupiec, B

AU - Morgan-Davies, C

AU - Milne, CE

AU - Ringrose, S

AU - Goddard, P

AU - Phillips, K

AU - Waterhouse, A

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Extensive sheep farming systems make an important contribution to socio-economic well-being and the ‘ecosystem services’ that flow from large areas of the UK and elsewhere. They are therefore subject to much policy intervention. However, the animal welfare implications of such interventions and their economic drivers are rarely considered. Under Defra project AW1024 (a further study to assess the interaction between economics, husbandry and animal welfare in large, extensively managed sheep flocks) we therefore assessed the interaction between profit and animal welfare on extensive sheep farms. A detailed inventory of resources, resource deployment and technical performance was constructed for 20 commercial extensive sheep farms in Great Britain (equal numbers from the Scottish Highlands, Cumbria, Peak District and mid-Wales). Farms were drawn from focus groups in these regions where participative research with farmers added further information. These data were summarised and presented to a panel of 12 experts for welfare assessment. We used two welfare assessment methods one drawn from animal welfare science (‘needs’ based) the other from management science (Service Quality Modelling). The methods gave complementary results. The inventory data were also used to build a linear programme (LP) model of sheep, labour and feed-resource management monthby- month on each farm throughout the farming year. By setting the LP to adjust farm management to maximise gross margin under each farm’s circumstances we had an objective way to explore resource allocations, their constraints and welfare implications under alternative policy response scenarios. Regression of indicators of extensification (labour per ewe, in-bye land per ewe, hill area per ewe and lambs weaned per ewe) on overall welfare score explained 0.66 of variation with labour and lambs weaned per ewe both positive coefficients. Neither gross margin nor flock size were correlated with welfare score. Gross margin was also uncorrelated with these indicators of extensification with the exception of labour/ewe, which was negatively correlated with flock size and hence with gross margin. These results suggest animal welfare is best served by reduced extensification while greater profits are found in flock expansion with reduced labour input per ewe and no increase in other inputs or in productivity. Such potential conflicts should be considered as policy adjusts to meet the requirements for sustainable land use in the hills and uplands.

AB - Extensive sheep farming systems make an important contribution to socio-economic well-being and the ‘ecosystem services’ that flow from large areas of the UK and elsewhere. They are therefore subject to much policy intervention. However, the animal welfare implications of such interventions and their economic drivers are rarely considered. Under Defra project AW1024 (a further study to assess the interaction between economics, husbandry and animal welfare in large, extensively managed sheep flocks) we therefore assessed the interaction between profit and animal welfare on extensive sheep farms. A detailed inventory of resources, resource deployment and technical performance was constructed for 20 commercial extensive sheep farms in Great Britain (equal numbers from the Scottish Highlands, Cumbria, Peak District and mid-Wales). Farms were drawn from focus groups in these regions where participative research with farmers added further information. These data were summarised and presented to a panel of 12 experts for welfare assessment. We used two welfare assessment methods one drawn from animal welfare science (‘needs’ based) the other from management science (Service Quality Modelling). The methods gave complementary results. The inventory data were also used to build a linear programme (LP) model of sheep, labour and feed-resource management monthby- month on each farm throughout the farming year. By setting the LP to adjust farm management to maximise gross margin under each farm’s circumstances we had an objective way to explore resource allocations, their constraints and welfare implications under alternative policy response scenarios. Regression of indicators of extensification (labour per ewe, in-bye land per ewe, hill area per ewe and lambs weaned per ewe) on overall welfare score explained 0.66 of variation with labour and lambs weaned per ewe both positive coefficients. Neither gross margin nor flock size were correlated with welfare score. Gross margin was also uncorrelated with these indicators of extensification with the exception of labour/ewe, which was negatively correlated with flock size and hence with gross margin. These results suggest animal welfare is best served by reduced extensification while greater profits are found in flock expansion with reduced labour input per ewe and no increase in other inputs or in productivity. Such potential conflicts should be considered as policy adjusts to meet the requirements for sustainable land use in the hills and uplands.

KW - Animal welfare

KW - Economics

KW - Linear programming

KW - Profit

KW - Service quality modelling

KW - Sheep

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13345905673683

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13345905673683

M3 - Article

VL - 21(S1)

SP - 57

EP - 64

JO - Animal Welfare

JF - Animal Welfare

SN - 0962-7286

ER -