Abstract
This study tested whether food insecurity increases the effect of visual salience on food selection. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups; a control, a healthy-salience and an unhealthy-salience group. Dish selection was analyzed using chi-square and likelihood-ratio tests. Cue susceptibility was tested using Kruskal–Wallis tests across different levels of food insecurity. Participants experiencing food insecurity were not more responsive to visually accentuated cues. They also did not report higher susceptibility to promotional cues. For food retailers and public health actors, this points to more caution in how behavioral tools like salience are applied.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition |
| Early online date | 25 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | First published - 25 Nov 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Food insecurity
- behavioral cues
- cognitive load
- food choice
- heuristics
- visual salience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating how food insecurity shapes the effect of visual salience on food choices and what it means for cue-based interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver