Lateralization influences contest behaviour in domestic pigs

I Camerlink, S Menneson, SP Turner, M Farish, G Arnott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cerebral lateralization, i.e. hemispheric asymmetries in structure and function, relates in many species to a preference to attack from their left. Lateralization increases cognitive capacity, enabling the simultaneous processing of multiple sources of information. Therefore, lateralization may constitute a component of fighting ability (Resource Holding Potential), and /or influence the efficiency of information-gathering during a contest. We hypothesized that lateralization will affect contest outcome and duration, with an advantage for more strongly lateralized individuals. In 52 dyadic contests between weight-matched pigs (Sus scrofa; n=104; 10 wk age), the direction of orientation towards the opponent was scan sampled every 10s. Laterality indexes (LI) were calculated for the direction and strength of lateralization. Up to 12.5% of the individuals showed significant lateralization towards either the right or left but lateralization was absent at the population level. In line with our hypothesis, animals showing strong lateralization (irrespective of direction) had a shorter contest duration than animals showing weak lateralization. Winners did not differ from losers in their strength or direction of lateralization. Overall the results suggest that cerebral lateralization may aid in conflict resolution, but does not directly contribute to fighting ability, and will be of value in the study of animal contests.
Original languageEnglish
Article number12116
Number of pages9
JournalScientific Reports
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date14 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 14 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

swine
conflict management
animals
duration
Sus scrofa
information sources

Bibliographical note

1032202
1026554

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Cognition
  • Contest behaviour
  • Fighting ability
  • Game theory
  • Lateralization
  • Pig

Cite this

Camerlink, I ; Menneson, S ; Turner, SP ; Farish, M ; Arnott, G. / Lateralization influences contest behaviour in domestic pigs. In: Scientific Reports. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.
@article{9cfd2ebfd8af4dc69b279a70851555b8,
title = "Lateralization influences contest behaviour in domestic pigs",
abstract = "Cerebral lateralization, i.e. hemispheric asymmetries in structure and function, relates in many species to a preference to attack from their left. Lateralization increases cognitive capacity, enabling the simultaneous processing of multiple sources of information. Therefore, lateralization may constitute a component of fighting ability (Resource Holding Potential), and /or influence the efficiency of information-gathering during a contest. We hypothesized that lateralization will affect contest outcome and duration, with an advantage for more strongly lateralized individuals. In 52 dyadic contests between weight-matched pigs (Sus scrofa; n=104; 10 wk age), the direction of orientation towards the opponent was scan sampled every 10s. Laterality indexes (LI) were calculated for the direction and strength of lateralization. Up to 12.5{\%} of the individuals showed significant lateralization towards either the right or left but lateralization was absent at the population level. In line with our hypothesis, animals showing strong lateralization (irrespective of direction) had a shorter contest duration than animals showing weak lateralization. Winners did not differ from losers in their strength or direction of lateralization. Overall the results suggest that cerebral lateralization may aid in conflict resolution, but does not directly contribute to fighting ability, and will be of value in the study of animal contests.",
keywords = "Aggression, Cognition, Contest behaviour, Fighting ability, Game theory, Lateralization, Pig",
author = "I Camerlink and S Menneson and SP Turner and M Farish and G Arnott",
note = "1032202 1026554",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-018-30634-z",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Research",
number = "1",

}

Lateralization influences contest behaviour in domestic pigs. / Camerlink, I; Menneson, S; Turner, SP; Farish, M; Arnott, G.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, No. 1, 12116, 14.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lateralization influences contest behaviour in domestic pigs

AU - Camerlink, I

AU - Menneson, S

AU - Turner, SP

AU - Farish, M

AU - Arnott, G

N1 - 1032202 1026554

PY - 2018/8/14

Y1 - 2018/8/14

N2 - Cerebral lateralization, i.e. hemispheric asymmetries in structure and function, relates in many species to a preference to attack from their left. Lateralization increases cognitive capacity, enabling the simultaneous processing of multiple sources of information. Therefore, lateralization may constitute a component of fighting ability (Resource Holding Potential), and /or influence the efficiency of information-gathering during a contest. We hypothesized that lateralization will affect contest outcome and duration, with an advantage for more strongly lateralized individuals. In 52 dyadic contests between weight-matched pigs (Sus scrofa; n=104; 10 wk age), the direction of orientation towards the opponent was scan sampled every 10s. Laterality indexes (LI) were calculated for the direction and strength of lateralization. Up to 12.5% of the individuals showed significant lateralization towards either the right or left but lateralization was absent at the population level. In line with our hypothesis, animals showing strong lateralization (irrespective of direction) had a shorter contest duration than animals showing weak lateralization. Winners did not differ from losers in their strength or direction of lateralization. Overall the results suggest that cerebral lateralization may aid in conflict resolution, but does not directly contribute to fighting ability, and will be of value in the study of animal contests.

AB - Cerebral lateralization, i.e. hemispheric asymmetries in structure and function, relates in many species to a preference to attack from their left. Lateralization increases cognitive capacity, enabling the simultaneous processing of multiple sources of information. Therefore, lateralization may constitute a component of fighting ability (Resource Holding Potential), and /or influence the efficiency of information-gathering during a contest. We hypothesized that lateralization will affect contest outcome and duration, with an advantage for more strongly lateralized individuals. In 52 dyadic contests between weight-matched pigs (Sus scrofa; n=104; 10 wk age), the direction of orientation towards the opponent was scan sampled every 10s. Laterality indexes (LI) were calculated for the direction and strength of lateralization. Up to 12.5% of the individuals showed significant lateralization towards either the right or left but lateralization was absent at the population level. In line with our hypothesis, animals showing strong lateralization (irrespective of direction) had a shorter contest duration than animals showing weak lateralization. Winners did not differ from losers in their strength or direction of lateralization. Overall the results suggest that cerebral lateralization may aid in conflict resolution, but does not directly contribute to fighting ability, and will be of value in the study of animal contests.

KW - Aggression

KW - Cognition

KW - Contest behaviour

KW - Fighting ability

KW - Game theory

KW - Lateralization

KW - Pig

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-30634-z

DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-30634-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 30108266

VL - 8

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 12116

ER -