Abstract
A portfolio of agricultural practices is now available that can contribute to reaching European mitigation
targets. Among them, the management of agricultural soils has a large potential for reducing GHG
emissions or sequestering carbon. Many of the practices are based on well tested agronomic and technical
know-how, with proven benefits for farmers and the environment. A suite of practices has to be
used since none of the practices can provide a unique solution. However, there are limitations in the
process of policy development: (a) agricultural activities are based on biological processes and thus,
these practices are location specific and climate, soils and crops determine their agronomic potential; (b)
since agriculture sustains rural communities, the costs and potential for implementation have also to be
regionally evaluated and (c) the aggregated regional potential of the combination of practices has to be
defined in order to inform abatement targets. We believe that, when implementing mitigation practices,
three questions are important: Are they cost-effective for farmers? Do they reduce GHG emissions? What
policies favour their implementation? This study addressed these questions in three sequential steps.
First, mapping the use of representative soil management practices in the European regions to provide a
spatial context to upscale the local results. Second, using a Marginal Abatement Cost Curve (MACC) in a
Mediterranean case study (NE Spain) for ranking soil management practices in terms of their costeffectiveness.
Finally, using a wedge approach of the practices as a complementary tool to link science
to mitigation policy. A set of soil management practices was found to be financially attractive for
Mediterranean farmers, which in turn could achieve significant abatements (e.g., 1.34 MtCO2e in the case
study region). The quantitative analysis was completed by a discussion of potential farming and policy
choices to shape realistic mitigation policy at European regional level.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 37 - 49 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Environmental Management |
Volume | 170 |
Early online date | 17 Jan 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Print publication - 1 Apr 2016 |
Bibliographical note
1024829Keywords
- Cost-effectiveness
- Marginal abatement costs curves
- Mitigation strategies
- Soil organic carbon management
- Stabilisation wedges