Abstract
The use of molecular tools, principally qPCR,
versus traditional culture-based methods for quantifying
microbial parameters (e.g., Fecal Indicator Organisms) in
bathing waters generates considerable ongoing debate at the
science–policy interface. Advances in science have allowed
the development and application of molecular biological
methods for rapid (*2 h) quantification of microbial
pollution in bathing and recreational waters. In contrast,
culture-based methods can take between 18 and 96 h for
sample processing. Thus, molecular tools offer an
opportunity to provide a more meaningful statement of
microbial risk to water-users by providing near-real-time
information enabling potentially more informed decisionmaking
with regard to water-based activities. However,
complementary studies concerning the potential costs and
benefits of adopting rapid methods as a regulatory tool are in
short supply. We report on findings from an international
Working Group that examined the breadth of social impacts,
challenges, and research opportunities associated with the
application of molecular tools to bathing water regulations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 52 - 62 |
Journal | Ambio |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | First published - 2015 |
Bibliographical note
1023311Keywords
- Bathing Water Directive
- Fecal indicator organism
- Microbial pollution
- Public perception
- Recreational water quality
- Risk communication