Abstract
The vast majority of piglets reared in the EU and worldwide is tail docked to reduce tail
biting, even though the EU animal welfare legislation bans routine tail docking. Some
well-managed farms experience very low levels of tail biting among tail docked pigs. At
this point, there is little scientific evidence regarding the effect of tail docking on tail
biting prevalences in these kinds of conventional farms. The aim of this study was
therefore to compare the prevalence of tail injuries between docked and undocked pigs
in such a well-managed conventional piggery in Denmark where pigs in usual practice
were tail docked. This study included 1922 DanAvl Duroc × (Landrace × Large White)
pigs (962 docked and 960 undocked). Docked and undocked pigs were housed under
the same conditions, but in separate pens within the same stable. Pigs had ad libitum
access to commercial diets in a feed dispenser. Straw was provided daily on the solid
floor (10 g per pig per day), and each pen had two vertically placed soft wood sticks.
Pigs were individually earmarked and gender was determined just before weaning. The
stockpersons recorded antibiotic treatments, pigs moved to hospital pens and
euthanized pigs. From weaning to slaughter, a trained technician recorded tail
damages (injury severity and freshness) every second week. No tail damages were
observed within the tail docked group, whereas 23.0% of the undocked pigs got tail
bitten. On average, 4.0% of the pigs had a tail lesion on tail inspection days. The
results showed more pens with pigs weighed 30-60 kg with tail lesions (34.3%; P <
0.05) than in pens with pigs weighing 7-30 kg (13.0%) and 60-90 kg (12.8%).
Furthermore, more undocked pigs had to be moved to a hospital pen (P<0.05). Finally,
abattoir meat inspection data revealed more tail biting remarks in the undocked group
(P<0.001). In conclusion, this study suggests that housing pigs with intact tails even in
well- managed conventional herds will increase the prevalence of tail bitten pigs
considerably, and pig producers will need more hospital pens. Furthermore, the
abattoir data indicate that meat inspection data severely underestimate the number of
pigs experiencing to be tail bitten during the rearing period.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1825 - 1831 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Animal |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 10 |
Early online date | 15 Mar 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | First published - 15 Mar 2017 |
Bibliographical note
10303951031421
Keywords
- Behaviour
- Housing
- Pigs
- Tail biting
- Tail docking