This paper develops multiple-pollutant marginal abatement cost curve analysis to identify an optimal set of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation measures considering the trade-offs and synergies with other environmental pollutants. The analysis is applied to UK agriculture, a sector expected to make a contribution to the national GHG mitigation effort. Previous analyses using marginal abatement cost curves (MACCs) have determined the sector’s GHG abatement potential based on the cost-effectiveness of a variety of technically feasible mitigation mea- sures. Most of these measures have external effects on other pollution loads arising from agricultural activities. Here the monetary values of four of the most important impacts to water and air (specifically ammonia, nitrate, phosphorous and sediment) are included in the cost- effectiveness analysis. The resulting multiple-pollutant marginal abatement cost curve (MP MACC) informs the design of sustainable climate change policies by showing how the MP MACC for the UK agriculture can differ from the GHG MACC. The analysis also highlights research gaps, and suggests a need to understand the wider environmental effects of GHG mitigation options and to reduce the uncertainty in pollutant damage cost estimates. # 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|Pages (from-to)||55 - 67|
|Number of pages||13|
|Journal||Environmental Science and Policy|
|Publication status||Print publication - Mar 2013|
- Greenhouse gases
- Marginal abatement costs curves
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Multiple-pollutant cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation measures in the UK agriculture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Refined greenhouse gas reporting informs policy and mitigation measures to reduce emissions from agriculture
Bob Rees (Participant), Vera Eory (Participant), Kairsty Topp (Participant), Madeleine Bell (Participant), Stephanie Jones (Participant), Bruce Ball (Participant), Joanna Cloy (Participant) & Dominic Moran (Participant)