Multiple-pollutant cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation measures in the UK agriculture

V Eory, CFE Topp, D Moran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper develops multiple-pollutant marginal abatement cost curve analysis to identify an optimal set of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation measures considering the trade-offs and synergies with other environmental pollutants. The analysis is applied to UK agriculture, a sector expected to make a contribution to the national GHG mitigation effort. Previous analyses using marginal abatement cost curves (MACCs) have determined the sector’s GHG abatement potential based on the cost-effectiveness of a variety of technically feasible mitigation mea- sures. Most of these measures have external effects on other pollution loads arising from agricultural activities. Here the monetary values of four of the most important impacts to water and air (specifically ammonia, nitrate, phosphorous and sediment) are included in the cost- effectiveness analysis. The resulting multiple-pollutant marginal abatement cost curve (MP MACC) informs the design of sustainable climate change policies by showing how the MP MACC for the UK agriculture can differ from the GHG MACC. The analysis also highlights research gaps, and suggests a need to understand the wider environmental effects of GHG mitigation options and to reduce the uncertainty in pollutant damage cost estimates. # 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55 - 67
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume27
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 2013

Fingerprint

abatement cost
greenhouse gas
agriculture
pollutant
cost
mitigation
cost analysis
environmental effect
ammonia
mitigation measure
nitrate
damage
climate change
air
sediment
analysis

Bibliographical note

1023326
1023353
1023407

Keywords

  • Co-effects
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Greenhouse gases
  • Marginal abatement costs curves
  • Nitrogen
  • Phosphorus

Cite this

@article{5a3cd399740046178b7971701f45fc6d,
title = "Multiple-pollutant cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation measures in the UK agriculture",
abstract = "This paper develops multiple-pollutant marginal abatement cost curve analysis to identify an optimal set of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation measures considering the trade-offs and synergies with other environmental pollutants. The analysis is applied to UK agriculture, a sector expected to make a contribution to the national GHG mitigation effort. Previous analyses using marginal abatement cost curves (MACCs) have determined the sector’s GHG abatement potential based on the cost-effectiveness of a variety of technically feasible mitigation mea- sures. Most of these measures have external effects on other pollution loads arising from agricultural activities. Here the monetary values of four of the most important impacts to water and air (specifically ammonia, nitrate, phosphorous and sediment) are included in the cost- effectiveness analysis. The resulting multiple-pollutant marginal abatement cost curve (MP MACC) informs the design of sustainable climate change policies by showing how the MP MACC for the UK agriculture can differ from the GHG MACC. The analysis also highlights research gaps, and suggests a need to understand the wider environmental effects of GHG mitigation options and to reduce the uncertainty in pollutant damage cost estimates. # 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Co-effects, Cost-effectiveness, Greenhouse gases, Marginal abatement costs curves, Nitrogen, Phosphorus",
author = "V Eory and CFE Topp and D Moran",
note = "1023326 1023353 1023407",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "55 -- 67",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Multiple-pollutant cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation measures in the UK agriculture. / Eory, V; Topp, CFE; Moran, D.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 27, 2013, p. 55 - 67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple-pollutant cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation measures in the UK agriculture

AU - Eory, V

AU - Topp, CFE

AU - Moran, D

N1 - 1023326 1023353 1023407

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper develops multiple-pollutant marginal abatement cost curve analysis to identify an optimal set of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation measures considering the trade-offs and synergies with other environmental pollutants. The analysis is applied to UK agriculture, a sector expected to make a contribution to the national GHG mitigation effort. Previous analyses using marginal abatement cost curves (MACCs) have determined the sector’s GHG abatement potential based on the cost-effectiveness of a variety of technically feasible mitigation mea- sures. Most of these measures have external effects on other pollution loads arising from agricultural activities. Here the monetary values of four of the most important impacts to water and air (specifically ammonia, nitrate, phosphorous and sediment) are included in the cost- effectiveness analysis. The resulting multiple-pollutant marginal abatement cost curve (MP MACC) informs the design of sustainable climate change policies by showing how the MP MACC for the UK agriculture can differ from the GHG MACC. The analysis also highlights research gaps, and suggests a need to understand the wider environmental effects of GHG mitigation options and to reduce the uncertainty in pollutant damage cost estimates. # 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - This paper develops multiple-pollutant marginal abatement cost curve analysis to identify an optimal set of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation measures considering the trade-offs and synergies with other environmental pollutants. The analysis is applied to UK agriculture, a sector expected to make a contribution to the national GHG mitigation effort. Previous analyses using marginal abatement cost curves (MACCs) have determined the sector’s GHG abatement potential based on the cost-effectiveness of a variety of technically feasible mitigation mea- sures. Most of these measures have external effects on other pollution loads arising from agricultural activities. Here the monetary values of four of the most important impacts to water and air (specifically ammonia, nitrate, phosphorous and sediment) are included in the cost- effectiveness analysis. The resulting multiple-pollutant marginal abatement cost curve (MP MACC) informs the design of sustainable climate change policies by showing how the MP MACC for the UK agriculture can differ from the GHG MACC. The analysis also highlights research gaps, and suggests a need to understand the wider environmental effects of GHG mitigation options and to reduce the uncertainty in pollutant damage cost estimates. # 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Co-effects

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Greenhouse gases

KW - Marginal abatement costs curves

KW - Nitrogen

KW - Phosphorus

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 55

EP - 67

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -