Natural capital approaches to decision-making for collaborative landscape governance

Jayne H. Glass*, Kerry Waylen, Mark S. Reed, Leo Peskett, Brady Stevens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study explores if and how natural capital approaches can support collaborative landscape governance. We selected six initiatives across the UK that have taken varied approaches to working with natural capital. We assessed how they have articulated, described and valued their landscapes and natural systems, and the consequences of doing so. We found that processes of systematically describing natural assets and their benefits can stimulate local investment in ecosystem markets and bring people together to co-produce plans. However, efforts to monetarily value natural capital assets were not always necessary: in some cases, new partners and resources were enroled without monetary valuations. These findings challenge the current emphasis on valuation framings in natural capital approaches. They show how natural capital approaches can help address the simultaneous challenges of connecting disparate priorities and securing new funding sources. This offers insights for international efforts to support collaborative landscape governance that delivers multiple benefits for people and nature.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104133
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume171
Early online date18 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 18 Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors

Keywords

  • Collective action
  • Ecosystem markets
  • Ecosystem services
  • Landscape
  • Natural capital
  • Nature-based solutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Natural capital approaches to decision-making for collaborative landscape governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this